Template:Did you know nominations/Theory of Literature

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Allen3 ^talk 09:35, 2 November 2012 (UTC)

Theory of Literature

(

• Back to T:TDYK
• Article history

)

• ... that although Wellek and Warren's Theory of Literature was imprinted with three copyright dates, none were for the publishing year?

• ALT1:... that although Ingarden was critical of Wellek and Warren's Theory of Literature, the book may have helped promote his ideas?
• ALT2:... that Wellek and Warren's Theory of Literature has been called "ninety-nine parts a 'good offense' against its slain and buried foes"?
• Reviewed: Strange Fruit (novel)
• Comment: I trust this is long enough. Moved to main space from userspace today.

Created/expanded by Crisco 1492 (talk). Self nom at 15:37, 28 October 2012 (UTC)

• Just about long enough. Article looks to be in solid shape. Good to go by me. All of the alts read well too. GRAPPLE X 16:58, 30 October 2012 (UTC)

• Thanks for the review! — Crisco 1492 (talk) 22:33, 30 October 2012 (UTC)