Template:Did you know nominations/The Creeping Garden
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 10:39, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
The Creeping Garden
[edit]- ... that the film The Creeping Garden shows slime molds finding their way through a maze in search of food?
- Reviewed:
To be done asapReviewed Template:Did you know nominations/Huawei Watch after reviewer's suggestion.
- Reviewed:
Created by Dr.K. (talk). Self-nominated at 02:20, 29 September 2015 (UTC).
- New enough and long enough. Hook is cited and interesting. Spot checks finds no evidence of close paraphrasing. Just waiting on the QPQ. While we're waiting on that, might I suggest you have a read of WP:MOSFILM? One sentence sections should be avoided, and your particular one sentence sections can be combined. For example your 'music' and 'technique' section might be merged together under the section heading "production". Freikorp (talk) 15:12, 29 September 2015 (UTC)
- @Freikorp: Thank you for your review. I combined the two sections per your suggestion. I also reviewed Template:Did you know nominations/Huawei Watch for the QpQ. Δρ.Κ. λόγοςπράξις 16:12, 29 September 2015 (UTC)
- I've done a bit more tweaking. There is an award from a festival notable enough to have a Wikipedia article, so I've added that. I also felt the section names would need adjusting, since it's more than just a "premiere" in that section, now, and since "reception" could also mean how the film received at festivals, above? Adjust as you wish, please. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 22:18, 29 September 2015 (UTC)
- Great stuff. :) No adjustments necessary. Your work has been excellent. Thank you very much Shawn. Please feel free to improve the article at any time. Nice meeting you. Take care. Δρ.Κ. λόγοςπράξις 22:30, 29 September 2015 (UTC)
- Well, I guess my concern is that we're not really following the suggested sections in WP:MOSFILM, which would have us list festivals under Release and awards and critical reviews together under Accolades? But I suppose these are suggestions only. I work quite a lot in the doc film area and can't think of too many cases where I've seen an Accolade section, per se. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 22:43, 29 September 2015 (UTC)
- You are more knowledgeable in that area than I am. Please feel free to modify the sections as necessary. Thank you again. Δρ.Κ. λόγοςπράξις 22:52, 29 September 2015 (UTC)
- Okay, I've applied MOS:FILM's suggested layout. Looks okay. Don't think I broke the wiki. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 23:00, 29 September 2015 (UTC)
- You are more knowledgeable in that area than I am. Please feel free to modify the sections as necessary. Thank you again. Δρ.Κ. λόγοςπράξις 22:52, 29 September 2015 (UTC)
- Well, I guess my concern is that we're not really following the suggested sections in WP:MOSFILM, which would have us list festivals under Release and awards and critical reviews together under Accolades? But I suppose these are suggestions only. I work quite a lot in the doc film area and can't think of too many cases where I've seen an Accolade section, per se. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 22:43, 29 September 2015 (UTC)
- Great stuff. :) No adjustments necessary. Your work has been excellent. Thank you very much Shawn. Please feel free to improve the article at any time. Nice meeting you. Take care. Δρ.Κ. λόγοςπράξις 22:30, 29 September 2015 (UTC)
- I've done a bit more tweaking. There is an award from a festival notable enough to have a Wikipedia article, so I've added that. I also felt the section names would need adjusting, since it's more than just a "premiere" in that section, now, and since "reception" could also mean how the film received at festivals, above? Adjust as you wish, please. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 22:18, 29 September 2015 (UTC)
Good to go now. Well done on the article. Just FYI an accolades section is only for awards, not critical response. I'll make some minor changes accordingly. Freikorp (talk) 23:31, 29 September 2015 (UTC)
- Yes, I see you're right, I misread Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style/Film#Accolades. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 23:33, 29 September 2015 (UTC)