Template:Did you know nominations/The Bear season 2
Appearance
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Theleekycauldron talk 08:37, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
DYK toolbox |
---|
The Bear season 2
- ... that the second season of The Bear has won the most Emmys for any comedy series in a single year?
- Reviewed:
Mjks28 (talk) 02:32, 25 September 2024 (UTC).
- Proper length and age, I can easily find the source in the article and the source, and the hook is interesting. No other issues. Nice work. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lbal (talk • contribs) 22:28, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
- @Mjks28 and Lbal: Earwig shows that The Bear season 2 §§ ep12 and ep18 are largely identical to the first paragraphs of Honeydew Transcript and The Bear Transcript, respectively. For the former, there's an archive showing that it existed on July 16, over a month before the Wikipedia article was published. This potential copyright violation should have been found in the review, and needs to be addressed before the hook can be promoted to prep. jlwoodwa (talk) 20:35, 27 October 2024 (UTC)
- @Mjks28: could you please address the copyright problems within a week? theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 04:22, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- @Theleekycauldron: Sure thing, what would you like me to do specifically? --Mjks28 (talk • contribs) 04:54, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Repinging theleekycauldron, since previous ping wouldn't have gone through since the post lacked a sig. BlueMoonset (talk) 05:42, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- @Mjks28: The bits of text that jlwoodwa pointed out are too similar to their sources need to be rephrased so that they are not direct copyright violations or close paraphrasing. theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 07:06, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- @Theleekycauldron: I copied the episode table from the parent article, so I did not create these copyright violations, but I am happy to fix the issues. —Mjks28 (talk) 08:03, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- @Theleekycauldron: Done :) Let me know if there's anything else I can do to help —Mjks28 (talk) 08:22, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- @jlwoodwa: looks good now? theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 08:23, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- I checked the history of The Bear (TV series), and those summaries evolved naturally there – it looks like the external links I found were actually copying from Wikipedia. @Mjks28: copying within Wikipedia requires attribution, mainly for copyright reasons but also to avoid situations like this one. Please provide proper attribution in the edit summary when you move text between articles, and retroactively supply attribution if you forget. @Theleekycauldron: Yep, good to go. jlwoodwa (talk) 08:36, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- @jlwoodwa: looks good now? theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 08:23, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- @Theleekycauldron: Done :) Let me know if there's anything else I can do to help —Mjks28 (talk) 08:22, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- @Theleekycauldron: I copied the episode table from the parent article, so I did not create these copyright violations, but I am happy to fix the issues. —Mjks28 (talk) 08:03, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Repinging theleekycauldron, since previous ping wouldn't have gone through since the post lacked a sig. BlueMoonset (talk) 05:42, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- @Theleekycauldron: Sure thing, what would you like me to do specifically? --Mjks28 (talk • contribs) 04:54, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- @Mjks28: could you please address the copyright problems within a week? theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 04:22, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- @Mjks28 and Lbal: Earwig shows that The Bear season 2 §§ ep12 and ep18 are largely identical to the first paragraphs of Honeydew Transcript and The Bear Transcript, respectively. For the former, there's an archive showing that it existed on July 16, over a month before the Wikipedia article was published. This potential copyright violation should have been found in the review, and needs to be addressed before the hook can be promoted to prep. jlwoodwa (talk) 20:35, 27 October 2024 (UTC)