Template:Did you know nominations/Sangeeta Isvaran

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 18:49, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

Sangeeta Isvaran

(

)

... that the Bharatanatyam dancer Sangeeta Isvaran works with deprived communities and uses dance and theatre in an effort to bring about social reform? Source: Vijay, Hema (21 January 2012). "With society as stage". Deccan Herald. Archived from the original on 31 December 2020.

Comment: Note that I have replaced "abused children, victims of natural disasters, street children, drug addicts and commercial sex workers, among others" in the article and citation with "underprivileged communities" for the DYK.
ALT1:... that the Bharatanatyam dancer Sangeeta Isvaran recieved formal training in the classical dance tradition from the age of five? Source: Sivashankar, Nithya (30 November 2011). "Making a song and dance of it". The Hindu. ISSN 0971-751X.

Created by Tayi Arajakate (talk). Self-nominated at 17:17, 1 January 2021 (UTC).

I will pick this review shortly. Ktin (talk) 08:15, 2 January 2021 (UTC)

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

QPQ: None required.

Overall: Article meets eligibility criteria for length (tad short, but, crisp) and newness. Adequately sourced. Copyvio checks out good. Tone is neutral. Sourcing for ALT0 looks good. Sourcing for ALT1 looks good. Assuming that the nominator has less than 5 submissions and hence does not need a QPQ as of yet. Please keep me honest, since, I know that the nominator does have a few submissions through the pipeline. Regarding substitution of the string of text with underprivileged, see if you can substitute it with a different word. Ktin (talk) 17:11, 2 January 2021 (UTC)

Ktin, This was my third nomination and since I've made a fourth nomination as well, any more submissions after this would require a QPQ from me. Regarding the substitution, I could use "marginalised people" or "deprived communities" or perhaps shorten it by omitting part of the string to something like "abused children, drug addicts, sex workers and others". Which one would you prefer? Tayi Arajakate _Talk 13:12, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

@Tayi Arajakate:. Let's go with deprived communities. Good on QPQ per your note. Ktin (talk) 19:05, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

Ktin, sounds good. I've changed the wording in the hook. Tayi Arajakate _Talk 21:50, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

Approved. Approving both hooks ALT0 and ALT1 for next steps. Nice and clean nomination and article. Ktin (talk) 21:54, 3 January 2021 (UTC)