Talk:Sangeeta Isvaran

A fact from Sangeeta Isvaran appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 20 January 2021 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the Bharatanatyam dancer Sangeeta Isvaran works with deprived communities and uses dance and theatre in an effort to bring about social reform?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2021/January. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Sangeeta Isvaran.

Wikipedia

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Women in Red: 2020

This article was created or improved as part of the Women in Red project in 2020. The editor(s) involved may be new; please assume good faith regarding their contributions before making changes.Women in RedWikipedia:WikiProject Women in RedTemplate:WikiProject Women in RedWomen in Red articles

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.

Women artists

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women artists, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women artists on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women artistsWikipedia:WikiProject Women artistsTemplate:WikiProject Women artistsWomen artists articles

India

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 18:49, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

... that the Bharatanatyam dancer Sangeeta Isvaran works with deprived communities and uses dance and theatre in an effort to bring about social reform? Source: Vijay, Hema (21 January 2012). "With society as stage". Deccan Herald. Archived from the original on 31 December 2020.

Comment: Note that I have replaced "abused children, victims of natural disasters, street children, drug addicts and commercial sex workers, among others" in the article and citation with "underprivileged communities" for the DYK.
ALT1:... that the Bharatanatyam dancer Sangeeta Isvaran recieved formal training in the classical dance tradition from the age of five? Source: Sivashankar, Nithya (30 November 2011). "Making a song and dance of it". The Hindu. ISSN 0971-751X.

Created by Tayi Arajakate (talk). Self-nominated at 17:17, 1 January 2021 (UTC).[reply]

I will pick this review shortly. Ktin (talk) 08:15, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

QPQ: None required.

Overall: Article meets eligibility criteria for length (tad short, but, crisp) and newness. Adequately sourced. Copyvio checks out good. Tone is neutral. Sourcing for ALT0 looks good. Sourcing for ALT1 looks good. Assuming that the nominator has less than 5 submissions and hence does not need a QPQ as of yet. Please keep me honest, since, I know that the nominator does have a few submissions through the pipeline. Regarding substitution of the string of text with underprivileged, see if you can substitute it with a different word. Ktin (talk) 17:11, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ktin, This was my third nomination and since I've made a fourth nomination as well, any more submissions after this would require a QPQ from me. Regarding the substitution, I could use "marginalised people" or "deprived communities" or perhaps shorten it by omitting part of the string to something like "abused children, drug addicts, sex workers and others". Which one would you prefer? Tayi Arajakate _Talk 13:12, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Tayi Arajakate:. Let's go with deprived communities. Good on QPQ per your note. Ktin (talk) 19:05, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ktin, sounds good. I've changed the wording in the hook. Tayi Arajakate _Talk 21:50, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Approved. Approving both hooks ALT0 and ALT1 for next steps. Nice and clean nomination and article. Ktin (talk) 21:54, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]