Template:Did you know nominations/Rhus boothillensis
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Amkgp (talk) 05:00, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Rhus boothillensis
A fossil Rhus boothillensis leaf
- ... that the fossil sumac Rhus boothillensis (pictured) is named for a public fossil digging site in Republic, Washington? Source: "This species refers to the collecting locality, Boot Hill, where public diggers have collected fossil plants and insects for the past three decades." (Flynn, DeVore, & Pigg, 2019)
- Reviewed: Ankylorhiza
Moved to mainspace by Kevmin (talk). Self-nominated at 20:07, 5 August 2020 (UTC).
Hook is interesting enough for a broad audience, neutral, properly formatted, cited and matches source. Image has appropriate license, is suitable for main page, and is used in article. Page is long enough, has been expanded fivefold, is within policy, and properly cites reliable sources. Looks good to go for DYK overall! My only concern is the last sentence under Taxonomy lacks a citation, which appears like it should be the same source used for the rest of that paragraph? So it just needs to be moved to the end of the section (correct me if I'm wrong and it's another source though). ▼PσlєοGєєкƧɊƲΔƦΣƉ▼ 12:42, 8 August 2020 (UTC)
- Extra reference tag added to the last sentence PaleoGeekSquared.--Kevmin § 22:41, 8 August 2020 (UTC)
No further issues! Ready for DYK now. ▼PσlєοGєєкƧɊƲΔƦΣƉ▼ 10:50, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
