Template:Did you know nominations/Recording Industry Foundation in Taiwan
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Philroc (talk) 14:22, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Recording Industry Foundation in Taiwan
- ... that after IFPI Taiwan established the IFPI Taiwan Charts in August 1996, the chart was noted for having its own World Wide Web site? Source: Burpee, Geoff (February 8, 1997). "Taiwan's Charts Challenged: Manipulation, Poor Methodology Charged". Billboard. Nielsen Business Media. Retrieved 8 March 2021.
the chart even has its own World Wide Web site
ALT1:... that the last certification made by Recording Industry Foundation in Taiwan (RIT), for Mayday's Second Round, is also the highest in the history of RIT, at 10× Platinum? Source: "認證紀錄". Retrieved 8 March 2021. shows both that it is the last, that it is 10× Platinum (拾白金唱片) and that it is the highest.- ALT2:... that the last certification made by Recording Industry Foundation in Taiwan (RIT) was in 2012, at 10× Platinum for Mayday's Second Round? Source: "認證紀錄". Retrieved 8 March 2021. shows both that it is the last and that it is 10× Platinum (拾白金唱片).
- ALT3:... that the highest certification made by Recording Industry Foundation in Taiwan (RIT) was 21× Platinum, awarded to James Horner's Titanic: Music from the Motion Picture? Source: "認證紀錄". Retrieved 8 March 2021.
Created by Muhandes (talk). Self-nominated at 16:22, 8 March 2021 (UTC).
| General: Article is new enough and long enough |
|---|
| Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
|---|
|
Hook eligibility:
- Cited:
- Interesting:
| QPQ: Done. |
Overall: 
I've adjusted one of the hooks slightly. I don't fully see how ALT3 is supported by the source – does "(I)21P" mean 12× Platinum, or should that be 21× Platinum? In any case I think ALT0 is the most interesting. —Mx. Granger (talk · contribs) 18:50, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
- @Mx. Granger: You are correct, that was supposed to be 21x, I corrected it. I also found ALT0 to be the most interesting, but different people have different tastes so I provided two more. --Muhandes (talk) 00:42, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
Looks good. —Mx. Granger (talk · contribs) 16:35, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
- @Mx. Granger: You are correct, that was supposed to be 21x, I corrected it. I also found ALT0 to be the most interesting, but different people have different tastes so I provided two more. --Muhandes (talk) 00:42, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
