Template:Did you know nominations/Platform Panic
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:10, 13 July 2016 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Platform Panic
[edit]- ... that in iOS and Android platformer Platform Panic, many of the available skins are references to characters from retro games, such as Mario and Sonic the Hedgehog?
Moved to mainspace by Omni Flames (talk). Self-nominated at 09:36, 4 July 2016 (UTC).
- Brought live within the past seven days: check. At 3,182 characters, is long enough. Within policy: check. 163 characters < 200, I find the hook interesting, the hook is cited, and the hook is neutral. QPQ was accomplished, and no image was provided.
— fourthords | =Λ= | 02:09, 5 July 2016 (UTC)
@Fourthords: you should provide a review that explicitly confirms that the five main DYK criteria have been met. Neutrality and close paraphrasing checks are left to be done. Thanks, Yoninah (talk) 15:54, 8 July 2016 (UTC)
- Since neutrality and close paragraphing are listed under "Within policy" (as displayed above the edit window), when I said "Within policy: check", I meant to imply that I'd checked all three criteria listed. I didn't realize I needed to explicitly hit each bullet. I do though find that the article and hook conform to a neutral point of view and are free of any close paragraphing so far as I can discern. — fourthords | =Λ= | 23:25, 8 July 2016 (UTC)
- Since neutrality and close paragraphing are listed under "Within policy" (as displayed above the edit window), when I said "Within policy: check", I meant to imply that I'd checked all three criteria listed. I didn't realize I needed to explicitly hit each bullet. I do though find that the article and hook conform to a neutral point of view and are free of any close paragraphing so far as I can discern.
- Brought live within the past seven days: check. At 3,182 characters, is long enough. Within policy: check. 163 characters < 200, I find the hook interesting, the hook is cited, and the hook is neutral. QPQ was accomplished, and no image was provided.
