Template:Did you know nominations/Persoonia laxa

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by PFHLai (talk) 05:08, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

Persoonia laxa

(

)

... that the shrub Persoonia laxa was found in Sydney but is now presumed extinct?

ALT1:... that the shrub Persoonia laxa from Sydney is known from only two specimens?
ALT2:" and/or so forth. -->
Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/David Brand, Lord Brand

5x expanded by Casliber (talk). Self-nominated at 12:47, 28 January 2016 (UTC).

I think the original hook is problematical. I prefer it, but it should say "presumed" extinct. 'One cannot say with assurance that water babies do not exist unless one has seen them not existing.' Otherwise, 5X expansion confirmed. Meets core policies and guidelines. Free of copyright violations or close paraphrasing. Every paragraph is cited. The hook —as I have suggested it be reworded—is supported by in line citations. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 13:06, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

Yup. added. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 13:13, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

Review 7&6=thirteen (☎) 13:15, 28 January 2016 (UTC)