Template:Did you know nominations/People v. Diaz

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:34, 19 March 2012 (UTC)

People v. Diaz

(

• Back to T:TDYK
• Article history

)

• ... that after the landmark decision of People v. Diaz, in California, the police can search your phone incident to arrest without a warrant?

Created/expanded by Applecupcake (talk). Nominated by Pengstr (talk) at 03:12, 6 March 2012 (UTC)

checks out, but hook could be clearer, therefore

• ALT 1 that People v. Diaz upholds the right of police in California to make warrentless searches of cell phones during a lawful arrest?

• • Comment: Sounds great! Though shouldn't it be "warrantless"? Applecupcake (talk) 08:29, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
  • ALT 2 that People v. Diaz upholds the right of police in California to make warrantless searches of cell phones during a lawful arrest?

checks out:date, length, hook cite, etc

Added link to search incident to arrest in hook ... this should be there. Daniel Case (talk) 18:57, 19 March 2012 (UTC)