Template:Did you know nominations/Pachycondyla petrosa

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Allen3 ^talk 11:38, 5 November 2015 (UTC)

Pachycondyla petrosa

(

)

Pachycondyla petrosa holotype

... that the one known fossil of Pachycondyla petrosa (pictured) might be a queen or a worker?

Reviewed: Dibaeis baeomyces
Comment: Reviewed Dibaeis baeomyces of the nomination.

Created by Kevmin (talk). Self-nominated at 22:19, 12 October 2015 (UTC).

· Size and creation date of article fine, and the article is appropriately cited. The hook is neutral, interesting enough, and short enough. Hook fact is mentioned in the article, but does not have an inline citation. Also, the url (doi) of the citation given at the end of the section appears to be dead. Spot checks did not reveal close paraphrasing. Picture is used in the article, and license on Commons ok. QPQ done. Oceanh (talk) 16:38, 27 October 2015 (UTC)

Additional citation added to the article for hook.--Kev min § 17:45, 27 October 2015 (UTC)

· Thanks. Hook fact has inline citation to journal article. AGF, since the cited article is behind a paywall. Oceanh (talk) 20:45, 27 October 2015 (UTC)