The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
Overall: Got verification of hook at exactly page 18 of cited source, thanks. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 10:04, 13 July 2024 (UTC)
@Generalissima and Vanderwaalforces: while the cited source verifies both that Nosy Komba is a well-trafficked ecotourism destination and a well-trafficked logging site for unscrupulous companies, it doesn't explicitly use one claim to undermine the other – I'm concerned that this hook would unfortunately fall afoul of WP:SYNTH as a result. theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 10:19, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
@Theleekycauldron: That's a good point. What if I rephrase it to "that environmental regulations are essentially unenforced on Nosy Komba, a center for ecotourism?" Generalissima (talk) (it/she) 15:11, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
Seems better :) maybe a little punchier if it were ALT0b: ... that Nosy Komba is a destination for both ecotourism and illegal logging? Will leave to Vanderwaalforces to decide. theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 21:22, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
Ooh yeah that's real good. Generalissima (talk) (it/she) 23:03, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
Got verification of hook at exactly page 18 of cited source, thanks. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 10:04, 13 July 2024 (UTC)
while the cited source verifies both that Nosy Komba is a well-trafficked ecotourism destination and a well-trafficked logging site for unscrupulous companies, it doesn't explicitly use one claim to undermine the other – I'm concerned that this hook would unfortunately fall afoul of WP:SYNTH as a result. theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 10:19, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
This is good now. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 15:34, 13 August 2024 (UTC)