The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cielquiparle (talk) 05:41, 10 March 2023 (UTC)
Overall: An interesting article. Thank you. The citation for the hook is taken in good faith, because the source is in a foreign language. I had to copyedit the article, because it was simpler to correct minor grammar or punctuation errors than to explain them to you. This will not affect DYK. As far as I can see, you do not need to do a QPQ yet, because I cannot find evidence that you have achieved five DTK credits. (However please continue the review that you have started, to prevent problems for the nominator. You have helpers there, so you should be OK.) Storye book (talk) 12:25, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
@Storye book: thanks for assuming good faith. To ease everyone's mind also can you please just googl "The Creation of Adam controversy in Sudan" and I also found this BBC article
Confirm gree tick. Thank you, FuzzyMagma. The article now has at least two citations (Letter from Africa (36) and MEMRI (39)) for the hook, which can be understood by English speakers. All is well, now. Storye book (talk) 18:11, 5 March 2023 (UTC)