Jump to content

Template:Did you know nominations/McDonnell Douglas F-4 Phantom II in UK service

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by ~ RobTalk 08:32, 3 August 2015 (UTC)

McDonnell Douglas F-4 Phantom II in UK service

[edit]
F-4J(UK) Phantom of the RAF
F-4J(UK) Phantom of the RAF

Improved to Good Article status by Hammersfan (talk). Self-nominated at 13:15, 9 July 2015 (UTC).

  • New enough (passed GA on 9 July), long enough, fully referenced. Nice PD image on Commons. Hook fine. AGF on offline source. No QPQ required. Good to go. Hawkeye7 (talk) 20:03, 1 August 2015 (UTC)
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: rejected by  — Crisco 1492 (talk) 08:45, 2 July 2013 (UTC)
Referencing

McDonnell Douglas F-4 Phantom II in UK service

[edit]

F-4J(UK) of No.74 Squadron

Created by Hammersfan (talk). Self nominated at 20:37, 24 June 2013 (UTC).

  • You've not linked the target article... Prioryman (talk) 23:24, 24 June 2013 (UTC)
  • I added a bold link, while keeping all existing wording and links. It could certainly be done differently, including with a new hook. MANdARAX  XAЯAbИAM 00:41, 25 June 2013 (UTC)
  • I think that that is the best hook, but it could be enhanced by adding "which were regarded as better than the ones already in service". However, the fact that they had to buy second hand ones is often seen as worthy of mention wherever the Phantom in UK service is discussed. Hammersfan (talk) 09:10, 25 June 2013 (UTC)
    • Article is not fully referenced. Hawkeye7 (talk) 20:41, 26 June 2013 (UTC)