Template:Did you know nominations/Kinal
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by PumpkinSky talk 10:54, 5 July 2012 (UTC)
Kinal
[edit]- ... that the Maya city of Kinal in northern Guatemala possessed an unusually complex acropolis but is noted for its complete absence of sculpted monuments?
- Comment: 5x expansion.
- Reviewed: Floppy trunk syndrome
Created/expanded by Simon Burchell (talk). Self nom at 13:47, 29 June 2012 (UTC)
- Length and date ok; re the hook, my understanding of the source is that the absence of "monuments" is narrowly construed as meaning altars/stelai; however there is mention of estuco ?=stucco? - is that sculpted? Thanks, Maculosae tegmine lyncis (talk) 18:18, 2 July 2012 (UTC)
- There is no mention of the stucco being sculpted in the sources. However, even if it were, sculpted stucco would have been part of the decoration of a building and would not be classified as a sculpted monument. All the best Simon Burchell (talk) 06:45, 3 July 2012 (UTC)
- Length and date ok; re the hook, my understanding of the source is that the absence of "monuments" is narrowly construed as meaning altars/stelai; however there is mention of estuco ?=stucco? - is that sculpted? Thanks, Maculosae tegmine lyncis (talk) 18:18, 2 July 2012 (UTC)
- ALT1: ... that the Maya city of Kinal in northern Guatemala possessed an unusually complex acropolis but is noted for its complete absence of sculpted stelae and altars? Maculosae tegmine lyncis (talk) 22:29, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
- Fine by me. Thanks, Simon Burchell (talk) 06:13, 5 July 2012 (UTC)