Template:Did you know nominations/K-23 (Kansas highway)
Appearance
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Amkgp (talk) 05:43, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
DYK toolbox |
---|
K-23 (Kansas highway)
... that K-23 (Kansas highway) was first established as K-20 in 1926, but was renumbered K-23 by 1927?Source: 1926 Rand McNally Atlas and 1927 Rand McNally Atlas
Improved to Good Article status by 420Traveler (talk). Self-nominated at 18:49, 20 November 2020 (UTC).
- ...That's pretty common, isn't it? Nova Crystallis (Talk) 06:41, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
- I was coming to say the same thing. In this timeframe, highway systems across the US were in flux because of the creation of the U.S. Highway System. What makes this highway's renumbering interesting? –Fredddie™ 06:43, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
- Sounds good I agree to delete\not pass it. Just didnt realize it needed to be interesting, as many Ive seen passed aren't .420Traveler (talk) 14:26, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
- I wasn't saying being interesting is a requirement of DYK, but it certainly helps. A hook should make you want to click the link and read the article (this is my opinion). This hook doesn't do that. –Fredddie™ 06:14, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
- @420Traveler:@Fredddie: Being interesting is certainly part of our criteria: see WP:DYK#Cited hook a.
The hook should include a definite fact that is mentioned in the article and interesting to a broad audience.
- Here is a suggested angle:
- ALT1: ... that Kansas highway K-23 is known as Main Street in Cimarron, Dighton, and Hoxie?
- If you like this alt, each sentence mentioned in the hook needs an inline cite per WP:DYK#Cited hook. Yoninah (talk) 23:27, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
- @Yoninah: I do like that one. I added the citations, they may be in the wrong place but I'm new to DYK. Thanks -420Traveler (talk) 00:02, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
- Thank you. They belong in the article, not the hook, so I moved them to the article. ALT1 is ready for review. Yoninah (talk) 00:22, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
- @420Traveler:@Fredddie: Being interesting is certainly part of our criteria: see WP:DYK#Cited hook a.
- I wasn't saying being interesting is a requirement of DYK, but it certainly helps. A hook should make you want to click the link and read the article (this is my opinion). This hook doesn't do that. –Fredddie™ 06:14, 23 November 2020 (UTC)