Template:Did you know nominations/Jens Hansem

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Allen3 ^talk 10:54, 4 March 2014 (UTC)

Jens Hoyer Hansen

(

• Back to T:TDYK
• Article history

)

• ... that there were actually 40 variants of the "One Ring" designed by Jens Hoyer Hansen for use in shooting The Lord of the Rings films?

• Comment: From AfC queue, article creator has likely COI but subject is notable and interesting.

Created by Theoneringmaker (talk). Nominated by Gigs (talk) at 18:34, 25 February 2014 (UTC).

As far as I can see, this article is not new enough. I don't see an expansion either. The nomination needs to be made within 5 days of the article's creation. Étienne Dolet (talk) 07:54, 27 February 2014 (UTC)

• Well, actually, if you look at the article history, you'll see that the article was moved from Articles for creation on 25 February, which counts as creation. Another issue with the nomination is that for some reason the creator misspelled Hansen's name as Hansem, so I had to move the article. Manxruler (talk) 22:24, 27 February 2014 (UTC)

• Firstly, the Orphan tag needs to be removed. Then we can start evaluating everything else. This one looks like it needs a lot of work to be done. Étienne Dolet (talk) 09:12, 28 February 2014 (UTC)

• Yeah. I fixed the spelling of his name. Someone needs to de-orphan the article and do other work on it too. Manxruler (talk) 09:34, 28 February 2014 (UTC)

• De-orphaned. — Maile (talk) 12:58, 1 March 2014 (UTC)

• I did a fair deal of copy-editing and fixes to the article, and added two wikilinks and a little c-e to the hook. Manxruler (talk) 14:51, 1 March 2014 (UTC)

I'm kind of worried about whether the source for the hook is an WP:RS. It appears to be a blog runned by a couple of Lord of the Rings fans. Étienne Dolet (talk) 19:01, 3 March 2014 (UTC)

Étienne Dolet, can you please give a complete review of everything, instead of raising one issue after another. Whether there are several issues or only one, it very much helps to have the full review done—and you can't claim QPQ credit until it is. BlueMoonset (talk) 20:02, 3 March 2014 (UTC)

I have added two additional sources. One is a sort of art-design web magazine (I guess you might still call it a blog, but it's not really blog-like). The other is a Google books source. That should satisfy any sourcing concerns. Gigs (talk) 21:00, 3 March 2014 (UTC)

Okay perfect. The source for the hook is now a WP:RS. Long enough. New enough (considering that it was created through AfC). Orphan tag removed. Good to go. Great job editors for working together on this one! Étienne Dolet (talk) 22:49, 3 March 2014 (UTC)