Template:Did you know nominations/Henri Wald

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by ~Hue Sat Lum 02:39, 19 February 2014 (UTC)

Henri Wald

(

)

~~... that Henri Wald was fired from his job as a university professor due to him having views which his government disliked?~~

5x expanded by Futurist110 (talk). Self nominated at 00:35, 17 January 2014 (UTC).

I have now reviewed the DYK? nomination for this article -- Template:Did you know nominations/Monument to the Mersey Tunnel. Futurist110 (talk) 00:47, 17 January 2014 (UTC)

Your review on Monument to the Mersey Tunnel was incomplete and does not qualify as a QPQ. In order to qualify for QPQ, the review needs to meet the basics per DYK review instructions please begin with one of the 5 review symbols that appear at the top of the edit screen, and then indicate all aspects of the article that you have reviewed.— Maile (talk) 12:59, 19 January 2014 (UTC)

ALT1: ... that Henri Wald lost his job as a university professor because his government disliked his views?
ALT1 says the same thing but is more concise. Surtsicna (talk) 16:35, 18 January 2014 (UTC)

I fully approve of ALT1 here. Futurist110 (talk) 08:33, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

A valid QPQ is still needed before this nomination can proceed with a new reviewer; note that a different QPQ article will need to be reviewed. I did strike the original hook in favor of ALT1, as it's better written. BlueMoonset (talk) 19:16, 1 February 2014 (UTC)

Here is my new QPQ for this DYK? nomination of mine -- Template:Did you know nominations/Angela Stent. Let's seriously hope that I did not screw up on it anywhere. Futurist110 (talk) 20:25, 3 February 2014 (UTC)

I'm afraid the QPQ review is problematic: articles created in userspace are considered new when they are moved to mainspace. (Note that the nomination even says it was moved to mainspace.) Since the move occurred on January 25, and the article was nominated on January 26, it's clearly new enough. As long as someone else hasn't come in to do a review, though, you can do a new, valid review there for QPQ credit. BlueMoonset (talk) 03:26, 4 February 2014 (UTC)

You know what--please let me do a new QPQ later today (if I don't forget about it). Futurist110 (talk) 21:42, 9 February 2014 (UTC)

Sorry for the delay. Anyway, is this DYK? nomination good enough to be my QPQ here -- Template:Did you know nominations/Day-Elder? Futurist110 (talk) 04:04, 14 February 2014 (UTC)

Please let me know if I need to do anything else here for this DYK? nomination of mine. Thank you very much. Futurist110 (talk) 03:02, 16 February 2014 (UTC)

Full review needed now that valid QPQ has been supplied. BlueMoonset (talk) 06:16, 16 February 2014 (UTC)

The following has been checked in this review by Matty.007

QPQ taken care of
Article 5* expanded by Futurist110 on 17 January 2014, from 100 to 1807 characters of readable prose
Every paragraph is sourced (I fixed the age at death)
Dup det found no copyvios
Article is neutral
An infobox and more refs would be nice, but are not vital,
Hook is interesting and well sourced
Good to go. Thanks, Mat ty.007 17:45, 18 February 2014 (UTC)