Jump to content

Template:Did you know nominations/Angela Stent

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Allen3 talk 16:20, 9 March 2014 (UTC)

Angela Stent

[edit]

* ... that Angela Stent is a founding member of Women in International Security, an organization dedicated to promoting women's careers in the field of national security?

  • ALT1 ... that Angela Stent is on the advisory committee of Women in International Security, an organization dedicated to promoting women's careers in the field of national security?

Moved to mainspace by Chris troutman (talk), PremalST (talk). Nominated by Chris troutman (talk) at 09:26, 26 January 2014 (UTC).

This article is not new, and it was not expanded five-fold or more during the last five days. Thus, it does not appear to qualify for a DYK? nomination at the present time. Sorry. Futurist110 (talk) 20:24, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
@Futurist110: It was moved from AfC on the date I nominated it. And you're counting this as a QPQ? Chris Troutman (talk) 02:38, 4 February 2014 (UTC)


  • QPQ done by Chris Troutman on Jan 24, 2014. Article moved from AFC on January 25, 2014 and has 4439 characters (0 words) "readable prose size". Chris Troutman, Early Life and education section needs inline sourcing. — Maile (talk) 23:12, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
 Done Chris Troutman (talk) 23:46, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
Chris, I'm having a little trouble finding the sourcing words "founding member". I see she's on the Advisory Committee. What am I missing? Is it perhaps in another source? Also, do you want this nomination saved for International Women's Day on March 8? — Maile (talk) 00:31, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
You are correct. I could've sworn I read that exact wording but I can't find it now. I've written a new hook reflecting the corrected verbiage in the article. I'm fine delaying this hook to run on March 8th if that would be optimal, though that wasn't my original intent. Chris Troutman (talk) 01:57, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
This is good 2 go. Every paragraph is now sourced. ALT1 hook is stated in the article and appropriately sourced. Duplication Detector found no copyvio issues. I'll move this to March 8 holding area.— Maile (talk) 12:56, 9 February 2014 (UTC)