Template:Did you know nominations/Durango High School (Colorado)

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Allen3 ^talk 17:11, 30 September 2013 (UTC)

Durango High School (Colorado)

(

)

~~... that overcrowding led to the construction of Colorado's Durango High School, and its replacement?~~

ALT1:... that Spanish influenza closed Colorado's Durango High School a little over a year after it opened?
ALT2:~~... that construction of Colorado's Durango High School forced the abandonment of a block-long segment of 2nd Avenue?~~
Reviewed: Planococcus citri

Created by Chris857 (talk). Self nominated at 21:13, 25 August 2013 (UTC).

Have you thought of using the same citation name for all uses of the nomination form, and using {{rp}} to cite the different page numbers? See citation #2 at Mummy Cave for what I mean; it will save you a ton of space. There's no requirement that you use this method, so I'm not attempting to hold up the nomination at all. Nyttend (talk) 02:59, 27 August 2013 (UTC)

Full review needed. BlueMoonset (talk) 16:42, 17 September 2013 (UTC)

Article - created new on day of nomination, 25 August, so new enough; 3320 characters of readable prose, so long enough; neutral; at least one inline citation to every paragraph; no copy vios detected using earwig; I ran the pdf through duplication detector but it didn't want to play so did a quick skim through without seeing anything drastic; and assessed as start class so not a stub.
Hook - ALT1 is within length criteria at 98 characters; correctly formatted; correctly cited/supported by ref #5 in first para and ref #6 in 2nd para of 'History' section; and I found it the most interesting of the three hooks, so have struck the others.
QPQ done; no image.

My one reservation is this seems to be predominantly based on only one source, the Seyfarth pdf? I'll just give @BlueMoonset: and @Crisco 1492: a ping for their thoughts.... SagaciousPhil - Chat 11:46, 29 September 2013 (UTC)

Although buildings on the NRHP are generally considered notable, for the sake of DYK I agree with Sagaciousphil that at least one or two more references are needed, to allow a more balanced look at the edifice. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 17:13, 29 September 2013 (UTC)

I took a stab at looking, and I've found two more sources I can add (one also has several pictures, and floor plans, in PD). I'll get to adding those later today, hopefully. Chris857 (talk) 18:11, 29 September 2013 (UTC)

Thanks, Crisco and Chris857 for such fast responses. Let me know when you've finished adding refs and I'll get this signed off. SagaciousPhil - Chat 18:22, 29 September 2013 (UTC)

@Sagaciousphil: I've added the refs (3 in total actually) that I encountered today, which brought *some* additional content to the article, along with some more images. Chris857 (talk) 23:05, 29 September 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for adding those so promptly, Chris857, it looks much better now. By the way, the ping didn't work (anyone know why?) but I had it watch listed anyway.

Seems fine to me. SagaciousPhil - Chat 07:59, 30 September 2013 (UTC)