Template:Did you know nominations/Dennstaedtia christophelii

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Lightburst talk 20:12, 13 December 2023 (UTC)

Dennstaedtia christophelii

(

)

Dennstaedtia christophelii fossil frond

... that a Dennstaedtia christophelii (pictured) fern was figured in a dissertation 10 years before the species was named? Source: Pigg et al 2021 page 779 Referred specimens -"(RBCM P1576; US960-10656 in R. Y. Smith et al. 2012; note that this specimen was originally numbered RYS08-0064 in R. Y. Smith 2011)."
- ALT1: ... that the closest modern fern relatives to Dennstaedtia christophelii (pictured) of the Pacific Northwest are tropical species from South America? Source: Pigg et al 2021 page 800 "Discussion - " Dennstaedtia christophelii is most similar to two extant Neotropical species, Dennstaedtia producta Mett. and Dennstaedtia mathewsii (Hook.)C.Chr. " & Plants of the World Online. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew entries for species showing ranges in Colombia and Boliva respectively.
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Poecilia gillii

Created by Kevmin (talk). Self-nominated at 16:37, 2 December 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Dennstaedtia christophelii; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.

for ALT1, length, date, hook, close paraphrase check, QPQ ok. Image free on Commons. --Soman (talk) 11:03, 3 December 2023 (UTC)