Template:Did you know nominations/Bradoponera
Appearance
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:09, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
DYK toolbox |
---|
Bradoponera
[edit]- ... that species of the fossil ant Bradoponera (pictured) are suggested to have nested around epiphytes?
- ALT1:... that species of the fossil ant Bradoponera (pictured) are suggested to have nested in trees?
- Reviewed: Necromys
- Comment: reviewed Dark bolo mouse of the nomination
Created by Kevmin (talk). Self-nominated at 15:06, 14 July 2016 (UTC).
- Long enough. Written from a neutral POV. QPQ done. From what I understand, the image is okay. There are inline citations. However, there is some information that is left unsourced. Could you add a source to the information at the end of the fifth paragraph? And also to the sentence "The head is a rounded rectangular shape, being shorter then long, and a flat to slightly bowed rear margin." To avoid the possibility of original research. I couldn't read some of the studies, so I am passing off the information in the hook being being cited in good faith. Amgisseman(BYU) (talk) 20:00, 15 July 2016 (UTC)
- @Amgisseman(BYU): I added citations for the requested areas.--Kevmin § 19:15, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks! Article looks good to go! Amgisseman(BYU) (talk) 19:01, 18 July 2016 (UTC)