Jump to content

Template:Did you know nominations/Archencyrtus

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:41, 25 June 2016 (UTC)

Archencyrtus

[edit]

Created/expanded by Kevmin (talk). Self-nominated at 00:30, 21 June 2016 (UTC).

  • New enough (June 20), long enough (2,373 characters), neutral, only has once source but that's fine for a novel genus described only two years ago, no close para or copyvio noted in readthrough of article/its source, hook short enough, interesting enough, cited to ref 1 (of course) and mentioned in the ref, QPQ done, no image. Only issue is that the description needs at least one inline citation. Otherwise, ready to go. Let me know when you've gotten to this, Kevmin, and I'll happily tick this hook! Best, BobAmnertiopsisChatMe! 02:04, 22 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Oops! Done now!-Kevmin § 20:11, 23 June 2016 (UTC)