Template:Did you know nominations/Animal models of schizophrenia, Methylazoxymethanol acetate
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by PumpkinSky talk 11:09, 23 June 2012 (UTC)
Animal models of schizophrenia, Methylazoxymethanol acetate
[edit]( Back to T:TDYK )
( Article history links: )
- ... that rats treated with methylazoxymethanol acetate (molecular model pictured) are an animal model of schizophrenia?
- Reviewed: Baltimore and Lehigh Railroad, Algeripithecus
Created/expanded by Quasihuman (talk). Self nom at 23:30, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
- Alt1: ... that rats treated with methylazoxymethanol acetate (molecular model pictured) during gestation are an animal model of schizophrenia?
The first article, Methylazoxymethanol acetate, seems OK, but the other does not have the required fivefold expansion. Still, the nomination may pass if we consider a new hook, just about the first article. As the current one is explained in the second one, it should either be a new one, or the article changed to reflect that info. Cambalachero (talk) 22:06, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks for reviewing the nomination, Animal models of schizophrenia was moved from userspace in this revision on midnight of 10 June, the date of the move into article space is normally considered as the date of creation for DYK purposes, see Wikipedia:Did you know#Eligibility criteria point d. This one was hanging around in my userspace since January, it took me way too long to move it into article space! Quasihuman (talk • contribs) 22:50, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
- Sorry, I saw the edits in february and then the edits in June and compared the sizes, I did not notice the move log above. I will make a complete review tomorrow Cambalachero (talk) 03:20, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
- No problem at all, I've made the same mistake myself in the past. Quasihuman (talk • contribs) 11:29, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
Both articles are good to go. Cambalachero (talk) 22:32, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
- No problem at all, I've made the same mistake myself in the past. Quasihuman (talk • contribs) 11:29, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
- Sorry, I saw the edits in february and then the edits in June and compared the sizes, I did not notice the move log above. I will make a complete review tomorrow Cambalachero (talk) 03:20, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
