Template:Did you know nominations/Andrew Freedman Home

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Crisco 1492 (talk) 13:39, 9 May 2012 (UTC)

Andrew Freedman Home

(

)

... that the Andrew Freedman Home (pictured) served as a retirement home for "aged and indigent persons of both sexes", who had formerly been of "good circumstances"?

Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Swissair Flight 316
Comment: New page, but a five times expansion of Andrew Freedman#Andrew Freedman Home.

ALT1 ... that the Andrew Freedman Home (pictured), formerly a retirement home for wealthy individuals who had lost their money, is now a day care center and event space?

Created/expanded by Muboshgu (talk). Self nom at 18:07, 20 April 2012 (UTC)

Andrew Freedman#Andrew Freedman Home is 660 characters long. The whole new article is 3152 characters long. A fivefold expansion would require at least 3300 characters. Besides, references should not be just raw links, you may use {{Cite web}} to fix them. Cambalachero (talk) 12:46, 7 May 2012 (UTC)

I expanded the lead to more fully describe the contents of the article, and that puts it over 3300 characters. Citation templates are not required for DYK, but I do agree that they are preferable, so I've converted the references accordingly. – Muboshgu (talk) 22:59, 7 May 2012 (UTC)

article is now 3311 characters, references have been cleaned up and the article is well referenced through-out, time is ok and hook is sourced to this article: "He left most of his fortune for the establishment of a home for aged and indigent persons of both sexes, but with the proviso that the residents of the home be poor people who had once been in good circumstances" -- Esemono (talk) 06:26, 9 May 2012 (UTC)