Template:Did you know nominations/AFL Women's season seven

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Bruxton (talk) 23:59, 17 March 2023 (UTC)

AFL Women's season seven

(

)

... that Brisbane Lions's AFL women's team in the AFL Women's season seven became the first AFLW team to score more than 200 points across the first three rounds of a season? Source: https://www.womens.afl/news/104099/icymi-r3-crows-just-cruising-lions-the-real-deal-giants-forward-line-fix
- ALT1: ... that only one point (or 0.3%) separated the Brisbane Lions' and Melbourne Football Club's AFLW teams on top of the ladder at the end of the home-and-away season of AFL Women's season seven? Source: https://www.perthnow.com.au/sport/west-coast-eagles/aflw-dismal-west-coast-eagles-equal-lowest-ever-score-in-melbourne-demons-hiding-c-8695644
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/SooperDooperLooper
- Comment: There's like four hooks I could make from this from the Season notes section.

Created and improved to Good Article status by 4TheWynne (talk). Nominated by Onegreatjoke (talk) at 21:58, 1 February 2023 (UTC). Note: As of October 2022, all changes made to promoted hooks will be logged by a bot. The log for this nomination can be found at Template talk:Did you know nominations/AFL Women's season seven, so please watch a successfully closed nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.

Comment – I agree that there are a few good hooks that could come out of the season notes section alone, but think that at least one of them, about the top two teams at the end of the home-and-away season, would be more interesting, so I supplied an alternative above. 4TheWynne (talk • contribs) 02:44, 2 February 2023 (UTC)

I shall review this. Storye book (talk) 16:35, 11 March 2023 (UTC)

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

QPQ: Done.

Overall: Thank you for a fine and clear article with some impressive tables. There's a lot of work in that article, and that is appreciated.

Earwig showed up a quotation which had not been indicated with quote marks. To prevent accusations of plagiarism, II have added those quote marks to the article (this will not affect DYK).
In the article, please could we have at least one mention of the fact that the wage is in Australian dollars? The dollar sign on its own, on this US-based platform, would make that necessary, I think?

@4TheWynne: and @Onegreatjoke: If you could please indicate Australian dollars in the article on at least one occasion, then I believe this nom will be good to go. Storye book (talk) 17:02, 11 March 2023 (UTC)

Done – thanks for the appraisal; keen to know which hook you think should be used as well. In the meantime, there's a discussion happening at WikiProject level regarding the sequencing of sections in season articles – which affects this article – if anyone potentially wanted to weigh in. 4TheWynne (talk • contribs) 00:18, 12 March 2023 (UTC)

Thank you, 4TheWynne. Confirming green tick, for ALTs 0 and 1, with preference for ALT0 because it celebrates an achievement. Respect! Storye book (talk) 09:42, 12 March 2023 (UTC)