Jump to content

Talk:Zhang Zhan

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Sinophobia much?

[edit]

First, she isn't a journalist, she's a lawyer. Posting videos on twitter does not turn her into a journalist. Second, "tortured"? Shouldn't it be at least "allegedly tortured"?

Could people here stop trying to transform Wikipedia in an anticommunist McCarthyist platform and keep their political agendas away from this project? Dornicke (talk) 02:03, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dunno, Dornicke. 24 hpd in handcuffs & forced feedng sounds like torture, no? And comparsing the article with your "anticommunist McCarthyist platform" leads me to the conclusion that it is you, and not the article, that has a bias issue. On that basis, I'll remove the tag from the article. You could perhaps slap one on your forehead? --Tagishsimon (talk) 02:21, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I don't recall seeing journalists who received far worse treatment in the US and Europe being labeled as "victims of tortures" for being handcuffed, so I'll revert you. Dornicke (talk) 02:49, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
At a quick web search, she was referred to as a citizen journalist in headlines by the Guardian, Al Jazeera, NBC, CBS, Times of Israel and Deutsche Welle, and probably many others. The ultimate source of this may be AFP. Since Wikipedia merely paraphrases reliable sources, I recommend continuing to refer to her as a (citizen) journalist. I'm not personally sure it's worth debating whether the "citizen" moniker must always be included, but there might be reliable sources that clearly state that citizen journalists aren't journalists. If so, let's see them. Samsara 06:03, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I agree with Tagishsimon here, multiple reliable sources indicate that what Zhang Zhan experienced is indeed state torture and it also seems to indicate that she is being subjected to a show trial. But that is just my opinion. Since it is so widely stated in reliable sources that she is a citizen journalist and given that her work seems to meet the definition of citizen journalist I am happy for this article to continue referring to her as such. Samsara is right to point out that that Wikipedia is merely, and often does -indeed often should-, paraphrase reliable sources. On the sinophobia accusation, I fail so see how the article (in its current form as of writing this comment) is sinophobic or that people are "trying to transform Wikipedia in an anticommunist McCarthyist platform". Perhaps Dornicke could expand on how they believe this article is guilty of that? Covering issues such as this covered by multiple reliable sources, no matter how critical of a government it might be, does not equate to sinophobia (or any other type of prejudicial bias). --Discott (talk) 11:49, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Seems to be consensus that she is a citizen journalist so I will amend 'amateur journalist' (not sure what that means anyway), I think it is important to make clear she is not a professional journalist. 51.6.235.99 (talk) 14:30, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
It appears that several editors here are not familiar with the relevant Wikipedia policies, in particular WP:NPOV and WP:V. If an editor's personal beliefs or opinions diverge from what reliable sources state, we still go with the latter. Regards, HaeB (talk) 16:32, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Someone has now done a sneaky weird edit so the text now appears as "journalist" but links to the "citizen journalist" page. This is a bit misleading and should be edited back.

2A00:23C7:C005:4300:A966:8605:F7C8:774F (talk) 18:55, 31 December 2020 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.209.4.150 (talk) [reply]

Torture

[edit]

I have removed 'alleged' from the information on torture, there are now multiple reliable sources saying she has been tortured and describing the nature of the multiple methods of torture; prolonged use of handcuffs and other restraints and prolonged force feeding. John Cummings (talk) 15:05, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I've also added the Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment as a reference, her treatment fits with the definition:

1) intentional infliction of severe pain or suffering; 2) for a specific purpose, such as to obtain information, as punishment, or to intimidate, or for any reason based on discrimination; and, 3) by or at the instigation of or with the consent or acquiescence of State authorities.

John Cummings (talk) 15:55, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Just a note that I've removed this link as well as "Torture methods in the People's Republic of China". {{cite web}}: Text "access-2020-12-29" ignored (help) (not sure if you added the latter or someone else did), since basing claims about a specific case on these refs would be WP:SYNTH. This shouldn't affect the article as the relevant sections were already sourced adequately. Pieceofmetalwork (talk) 18:42, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An IP editor has been edit warring on the page, I've explained multiple times to discuss the issue here which they do not appear to be interested in doing, I've requested that they be blocked at Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism. John Cummings (talk) 17:09, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with the IP. You can not say she was tortured just because you cherrypicked sources that say so. Most reliable sources are using "allegedly tortured", and even if it wasn't the case, WP should anyway, because that's an allegation by her and her lawyer, not a proven fact. You do not endorse information which is not consensual as if it was, unless you intend to write a propaganda piece in favor of proving a point - not informing the readers. Dornicke (talk) 17:32, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hi @Dornicke:, I think the issue is the lack of clarity about what alleged means:
  1. That it is alleged that she has been handcuffed and forcefed for months?
  2. That she has been handcuffed and forcefed for months and it is alleged that this is torture?
Which do you mean when you are saying alleged?
John Cummings (talk) 17:41, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

1.it needs to be proven if these events actually took place.

2. If alleged events actually happened did it constitute torture in accordance to the UN human rights council SaSSurvival (talk) 22:04, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Trial and sentencing

[edit]

It seems like the charges section is getting a bit confusing, it might be helpful to have it as a full list of charges and which she was found guilty of. John Cummings (talk) 15:08, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This might help: https://mobile.twitter.com/skkboz/status/1343575199384420352 This Twitter thread and video has some of the offences that amount to "provoking trouble", such as harassing police/frontline workers, breach of privacy (videoing into hospital windows), public disorder (kicking over police barriers), etc.

Original source is her YouTube channel 2A00:23C7:C005:4300:4DC8:A8E5:4E94:FCCE (talk) 15:47, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

To explain how Wikipedia works, personal Twitter accounts (especially ones which spread conspiracy theories) aren't Wikipedia:Reliable sources so aren't used on Wikipedia. John Cummings (talk) 16:13, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
How about her YouTube as a source then. Here is her harassing police and kicking over a barrier:

https://youtu[dot]be/qQu14MMbANU

This is the YouTube content that has apparently made her a "citizen journalist" so I assume it's a valid source?

2A00:23C7:C005:4300:4DC8:A8E5:4E94:FCCE (talk) 23:29, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please have a read of Wikipedia:Reliable sources which describes which are valid sources for Wikipedia. Thanks, John Cummings (talk) 00:23, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

So her YouTube channel which is her entire "journalism" can't be used? Mmmm? 2A00:23C7:C005:4300:A966:8605:F7C8:774F (talk) 18:53, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please read Wikipedia:Reliable sources. John Cummings (talk) 18:04, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Source for "lawyer", when did she graduate university.

[edit]

When did she graduate university. How/when did she become a "lawyer"? Keith McClary (talk) 20:14, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Beginning of the hunger strike

[edit]

The page states: "Zhan has been on hunger strike since September 2020". However, according to the reference 11 (CBS news) she has begun her hunger strike at the end of June. Other provided references (10 and 12) do not contain information about the starting date of her hunger strike. Could it be corrected, please?--Owleksandra (talk) 13:45, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Owleksandra: thanks for this, one of the references said September (which I used) but as you have spotted others have said June, so I've corrected it. John Cummings (talk) 19:46, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Completed by John Cummings Terasail[✉] 01:22, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Journalist or not?

[edit]

Not sure why someone has now changed her to be a "journalist" in the summary, despite the link clicking through to the "citizen journalist" page?

She's not a journalist and even states in multiple videos on YouTube she isn't a journalist — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pandaman7 (talkcontribs) 19:02, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This topic has been discussed on the Sinophobia much? section of this talk page. Please see the discussion there for more information.--Discott (talk) 18:23, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Chinese point of view

[edit]

The article should also exlain why she was arrested. What says the chinese goverment? If a article should be neutral also the viewpoint of the chinese state must be heared. --2A02:8389:2181:A400:446:FE4F:4836:71E4 (talk) 13:28, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A section containing such material has now been created. It is to be noted, at least from this editor's impression, that the coverage of the Chinese viewpoint in the news has been rather limited, which makes it more understandable why this section had not been created earlier. However, the article did contain the allegation of two untrue statements by Zhang.--CRau080 (talk) 22:35, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 04:52, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Cite error: There are <ref> tags on this page without content in them (see the help page).== Awards ==

The Chinese citizen journalist Zhang Zhan has been awarded the International Forum 2000 Award for Courage and Responsibility during 2022’s Forum 2000 conference in Prague, Czechia. The participants of the Forum 2000 conference, and later members of the International Coalition for Democratic Renewal (ICDR) and the Forum 2000 network expressed their solidarity to Zhang Zhan, condemned the treatment by the Chinese authorities, and demanded her release. Raeq.Raeq (talk) 14:40, 27 June 2023 (UTC) [1][reply]

References

Release in May 2024

[edit]

Was she released on May 14, 2024? 98.123.38.211 (talk) 02:10, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

2024 arrest

[edit]

Shouldn't we add the fact that Zhang was arrested again around September 1, 2024 (only months after her release from jail)? Sources: https://rsf.org/en/china-rsf-raises-international-alarm-over-retargeting-journalist-zhang-zhan https://www.theguardian.com/world/article/2024/sep/03/gao-zhen-artist-known-for-work-critiquing-cultural-revolution-arrested-in-china 98.123.38.211 (talk) 14:34, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]