Talk:Zapatista uprising

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Zapatista uprising article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Mexico Low‑importance

	Mexico portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mexico, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Mexico on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MexicoWikipedia:WikiProject MexicoTemplate:WikiProject MexicoMexico articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Socialism Low‑importance

	Socialism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Socialism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of socialism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SocialismWikipedia:WikiProject SocialismTemplate:WikiProject Socialismsocialism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Politics Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: North America / Post-Cold War

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	North American military history task force
	Post-Cold War task force

Anarchism

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anarchism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of anarchism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AnarchismWikipedia:WikiProject AnarchismTemplate:WikiProject Anarchismanarchism articles

Anarchism WikiProject open tasks
watch · edit · history · talk · purge

Recognized content · Drafts & requests · Subscribe · Member list · Resources · How can I help?

Did you know

19 Nov 2024 – Anarchism without adjectives (talk · edit · hist) was nominated for DYK by Grnrchst (t · c); see discussion
15 Nov 2024 – Fagoppositionens Sammenslutning (talk · edit · hist) was nominated for DYK by Grnrchst (t · c); see discussion
05 Nov 2024 – 1931 Barcelona rent strike (talk · edit · hist) was nominated for DYK by Launchballer (t · c); see discussion
25 Oct 2024 – Voltairine de Cleyre (talk · edit · hist) was nominated for DYK by Grnrchst (t · c); see discussion

Good article nominees

22 Nov 2024 – Los Justicieros (talk · edit · hist) was GA nominated by Grnrchst (t · c); see discussion

Peer reviews

26 Oct 2024 – Lucy Parsons (talk · edit · hist) has been put up for PR by Mujinga (t · c); see discussion

Cleanup (0) · Potentially related articles · Recent edits · Recent Commons images · Stub expansion project (515)

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 4 February 2019 and 3 May 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Millie.hdz12.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 05:25, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Was this article written by the propaganda arm of the EZLN?

Wow, just wow. I've always complained about the Left-leaning slant and Liberal bias of Wikipedia but this article is outright absurd; does anyone notice anything even remotely weird or wrong with the following statements from the infobox?:

"Results: Zapatistas capture public imagination, inspire visions of alternative futures" [So stunning so brave they're real life superheroes] "Uprising dissipated as a result of strategic withdrawal [Not a defeat mind you] by the EZLN" "Zapatistas recuperated dispossessed land and protect practice of autonomy" [They're champions of the poor and the oppressed of course]

Let's at least pretend this is not so shamelessly biased, let's make an effort how about that? --177.230.47.65 (talk) 23:41, 11 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Stupid Propaganda

I just got an alert stating that I would be banned if I continued to make "disruptive edits" to this propaganda article. Neutrality my rear! -2602:306:39D6:CBA0:4801:6180:F69D:F83 (talk) 21:19, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education assignment: Latin American Politics

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 18 January 2023 and 9 May 2023. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): YeOlCo, Ochand23, Wevington, Bhowmanyusernamesdoineedtotryb (article contribs). Peer reviewers: Flowerpancakes, Monkeypenguin29, RollConts, Zacotto4, Sizzle-Tonk, Dcj800, CheetahMonkey, Ricklizard67.

— Assignment last updated by Heatvan (talk) 15:58, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unreliable sources?

@QueensanditsCrazy: Hi, I notice you recently added an unreliable sources tag to the article, but didn't provide an explanation either in the tag or the edit summary, which would be the responsible tagging etiquette. Could you explain why you put this tag here and what sources you think are unreliable? Thanks --Grnrchst (talk) 10:25, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I removed a web source that I couldn't find online (check my diff) and was concerned that other sources could be unfindable. Source 12 isn't a source; source 22 ain't bad but the relevant sentence we can quote from CONAPO (whatever that is, i assume it's a more reliable source than SIPAZ). Not sure if Source 9 is properly formatted but looks good; much of the rest looks reliable enough at first glance. Just wanted to call attention to the little bits that needed ironing out QueensanditsCrazy (talk) 13:07, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]