Talk:Zach's Shack

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Zach's Shack article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Food and drink Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Food and Drink task list:

To edit this page, select here

Here are some tasks you can do for WikiProject Food and drink:

Help bring these Top Importance articles currently B Status or below up to GA status: Agaricus bisporus (i.e. mushroom), Beef, Bread, Curry, Drink, Food, Ham and eggs, Soy sauce, Sushi, Yogurt
Bring these Top Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Beer, French cuisine, Sugar
Bring these High Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Apple, Burger King, Fish
Participate in project-related deletion discussions.
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here.
Provide photographs and images for Category:Wikipedia requested images of food
Consider joining this project's Assessment task force. List any project ideas in this section

Note: These lists are transcluded from the project's tasks pages.

Oregon Low‑importance

	Oregon portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Oregon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Oregon on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OregonWikipedia:WikiProject OregonTemplate:WikiProject OregonOregon
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
The current collaborations of the month are Women's History Month: Create or improve articles for women listed at Oregon Women of Achievement (modern) or Women of the West, Oregon chapter (historical).

United States: 50,000 Challenge Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article was created or improved during this WikiProject's 50,000 Challenge, which started on November 1, 2016, and is ongoing. You can help!

Sources

---Another Believer _(Talk) 15:40, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notability

I have tagged the article for notability due to the following reason: no indication of notability. just a run off the mill. The Banner talk 22:45, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Details

I have removed some irrelevant details from the list of food on offer. I left the types of hot dogs but removed the contents of the type of hot dogs. Reasoning is WP:NOTGUIDE. Beside that, it looks very much as advertising. The fact that it is mentioned in a source does NOT make the list of ingredients relevant for inclusion. The Banner talk 15:59, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Once again, I disagree with your removal of sourced details and would support restoration of this version of the article. ---Another Believer _(Talk) 16:02, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It may be sourced, but it is irrelevant and advertising. The Banner talk 16:08, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Strongly disagree. Please gain consensus before removing sourced details. ---Another Believer _(Talk) 16:18, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please gain consensus before restoring the irrelevant and spammy details. The Banner talk 16:35, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]