This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Microsoft, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles relating to Microsoft on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MicrosoftWikipedia:WikiProject MicrosoftTemplate:WikiProject MicrosoftMicrosoft
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Microsoft Windows, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Microsoft Windows on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Microsoft WindowsWikipedia:WikiProject Microsoft WindowsTemplate:WikiProject Microsoft WindowsMicrosoft Windows
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Software, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of software on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SoftwareWikipedia:WikiProject SoftwareTemplate:WikiProject Softwaresoftware
Not sure how to format the article - first time poster. The phenom is real and deserves a page.
I would think that for the time being, it should be placed in the main Zune article as its own section, provided there are some sources that can verify the phenomenon. --Hojimachongtalk21:36, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. Actually the phenomenon is covered in a section in the Zune article. True, it is being referred to as Z2K9, as well as Y2K9, but really it should be covered within the context of the article on the Zune. This page can redirect there.FlowerpotmaN·(t)21:38, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I disagree with the reasoning ("incoherent") behind the speedy deletion, but I do agree that this event doesn't warrant its own article just yet. Depending on the significance of the event (and whether the nickname "Z2K9" sticks or not), it MAY warrant one in the future. GunnerGuyven (talk) 21:49, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]