Jump to content

Talk:Yugoslav submarine Nebojša

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Featured articleYugoslav submarine Nebojša is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
Featured topic starYugoslav submarine Nebojša is part of the Ships of the Royal Yugoslav Navy series, a featured topic. It is also part of the Hrabri-class submarines series, a featured topic. These are identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve them, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
March 31, 2015Good article nomineeListed
July 4, 2015Good topic candidatePromoted
September 27, 2015WikiProject A-class reviewApproved
October 31, 2015Featured article candidatePromoted
July 15, 2017Good topic candidatePromoted
Current status: Featured article

Clarification

[edit]

G'day, Peacemaker, I think there is a minor discrepancy in the article. In the body it says "Her surfaced displacement was 1,164 long tons (1,183 t) (1,164 long tons (1,183 t) submerged)", but in the infobox it says "Displacement: 975 long tons (991 t) (surfaced) 1,164 long tons (1,183 t) (submerged)". Could you please clarify which is correct (I think it is the infobox, but I'm only guessing). Otherwise I think the article would rate as C class (it probably needs more coverage of service history: for instance what happened between 1927 and 1941, and did she see any action while attached to the British submarine flotillas?) Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) 10:38, 20 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

G'day, I've just adjusted this myself. Please check that I have corrected the right information as I am only guessing based on the infobox. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) 01:06, 27 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry AR, got distracted with something else. You are right. 975 surfaced, 1164 submerged. Thanks, Peacemaker67 (send... over) 01:13, 27 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
No worries, have a good one. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) 01:39, 27 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

8 days at sea?

[edit]

According to Divine, A. D. (1944). Navies in Exile. New York: E. P. Dutton. pp. 207–09., Nebojša left Kotor after 1800 hours on 17 April and arrived in Suda Bay on 24 April. Srnec (talk) 00:16, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

that is eight calendar days, is it not? Peacemaker67 (crack... thump) 00:56, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
It is, but the article currently says that it arrived in Crete on 23 April and I did not interpret "eight days at sea" to mean eight calendar days (I took it to mean roughly 192 hours at sea). I don't have access to the sources cited in the article, so I can't check to see why the discrepancy or who's in error. That's why I just posted the information and didn't speculate. Srnec (talk) 02:00, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, I doubt it was meant to be that exact, but I will look at some sources and add some clarity of I can find it. Cheers, Peacemaker67 (crack... thump) 02:11, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]