Jump to content

Talk:Yesterday's Enterprise

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Featured articleYesterday's Enterprise is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on April 8, 2017.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
June 17, 2011Good article nomineeListed
December 20, 2016Peer reviewReviewed
February 4, 2017Featured article candidatePromoted
Current status: Featured article

Number of pages in the script

[edit]

What is the significance of how many pages were in the original submitted script and whether it was single or double spaced? It seems like a random and picayune thing to include, unless it suggested some overweening fecundity on Trent Ganino's part, which it doesn't. 71.235.239.194 (talk) 01:08, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Blooper?

[edit]

If a 'Bloopers' section is added to this article, I have a blooper. Has anyone noticed, in the last scene (La Forge talking with Guinan in Ten Forward), La Forge is wearing the (Yesterday's Enterprise Uniform). GoodDay 23:49, 29 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, Geordi wears the wrong uniform in the final scene.--BigMac1212 (talk) 04:30, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Pips

[edit]

This article states that the alternate uniforms pips are on the left side instead of the right. They've always been on the right, even in the alternate timeline. I just analyzed the episode and not once did I see pips on the other side. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.16.224.110 (talk) 03:54, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

expansion

[edit]

What I assume would be a great opportunity for huge expansion on this article: http://www.amazon.com/Making-Yesterdays-Enterprise-Eric-Stillwell/dp/1435702565/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1203877780&sr=8-1. I may get around to it, but I'll put this here in case others are more gung-ho. — pd_THOR | =/\= | 18:31, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Some original research

[edit]

I've looked at the articles on the Klingon and Federation at war and there's a lot of Original Research in there. I'll remove it and discuss further on this talk page Alastairward (talk) 12:04, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

How does the time line work

[edit]

I am a huge fan of this particular episode but there is one thing that I dont understand about it. If the Enterprise C was sent into the future do to a round of Romulan blasters, should that meen that the War between the Federation and the Klingons been the story line from series one onwards till we got to that episode as that would of been the normal time line? I hope that makes sence anyways. MattyC3350 (talk) 06:28, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Episode number

[edit]

The page reads Yesterday's Enterprise" is an episode of the 3rd season of Star Trek: The Next Generation. Which episode of that season? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.150.114.174 (talk) 11:35, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Twilight Zone "The Last Flight"

[edit]

I am watching a Twilight Zone marathon, and the episode "The Last Flight" is almost identical to this plot. Heh-- maybe not so original... Davejenk1ns (talk) 18:56, 1 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Agree Davejenk1ns -- the plot is identical. Though that episode, in turn, was heavily based on a 1948 episode of the acclaimed radio drama series Quiet, Please. This is discussed on the Star Trek wiki but would love to find a verifiable reference that goes into this further. I enjoy sandwiches (talk) 16:53, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Virgin 1 - "Fans' Favourite Episode"

[edit]

May 23rd to May 25th, 2009
The UK TV channel Virgin-1 has been running a "We Love Star Trek Weekend" over the Bank Holiday weekend, with episodes voted for by visitors to the Virgin-1 website www.virgin1.co.uk . Apparently "Yesterday's Enterprise" was voted the "favourite episode". How important or noteworthy is that fact is left for others to decide. :) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.25.123.99 (talk) 17:16, 25 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect of Eric A. Stillwell

[edit]

This article links to and Eric A. Stillwell which redirects to this article. Should those links be removed?JesseMSmith (talk) 07:27, 24 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Circular links? Yep. Doniago (talk) 07:37, 24 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Yesterday's Enterprise. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:42, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Talk:Yesterday%27s_Enterprise&oldid=1209270033"