Talk:Year 2011 problem
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
[edit]It should perhaps be Y1H rather than Y1C if you're making an analogy with Y2K: 1000 = M (Latin numeral), or k (SI prefix); 100 = C (Latin numeral), or h (SI prefix). —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.140.96.21 (talk) 15:31, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
Looking at the date...
[edit]Given that 1 January 民國100 has been and gone, shouldn't the article be updated to reflect this? Where would one find reliable news on the ROC in English? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Odin of Trondheim (talk • contribs) 01:47, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
- Yes, you may google it here. However, it is still Chinese version. 203.186.23.33 (talk) 15:28, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Y1C Problem. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20100313141209/http://y100.dgbas.gov.tw:80/y100/faq/faq.asp to http://y100.dgbas.gov.tw/y100/faq/faq.asp
- Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20091210072831/http://y100.dgbas.gov.tw:80/ to http://y100.dgbas.gov.tw/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:15, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
Is there a citation/justification for the page rename done in March 2020?
[edit]I didn't do an extensive search, but I don't see any indications that this incident was called "the year 2011 problem". There are a number of instances that can be found -- a couple of which are already cited in the article -- of it being called "the Y1C problem".--NapoliRoma (talk) 00:31, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
- Stub-Class Computing articles
- Unknown-importance Computing articles
- Automatically assessed Computing articles
- All Computing articles
- Stub-Class Time articles
- Low-importance Time articles
- Stub-Class China-related articles
- Unknown-importance China-related articles
- Stub-Class China-related articles of Unknown-importance
- Automatically assessed China-related articles
- WikiProject China articles
- Stub-Class Taiwan articles
- Low-importance Taiwan articles
- WikiProject Taiwan articles