Talk:XMM-Newton

Spaceflight Mid‑importance

	Spaceflight portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spaceflight, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of spaceflight on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpaceflightWikipedia:WikiProject SpaceflightTemplate:WikiProject Spaceflightspaceflight articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Astronomy Mid‑importance

	Astronomy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Astronomy, which collaborates on articles related to Astronomy on Wikipedia.AstronomyWikipedia:WikiProject AstronomyTemplate:WikiProject AstronomyAstronomy articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Europe: ESA Mid‑importance

	Europe portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Europe, an effort to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to European topics of a cross-border nature on Wikipedia.EuropeWikipedia:WikiProject EuropeTemplate:WikiProject EuropeEurope articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by ESA task force (assessed as High-importance).

Untitled

The section "Observations & Discoveries" currently gives the impression that XXM-Newton has observed three objects during nine years of operations. Some more general statements on the achievements of the observatory is called for. /216Kleopatra (talk) 09:49, 10 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Deserves better

For such a long and successful mission/craft the article could be expanded and reorganised. There's lots of good info at the external links, eg the eccentric orbit to avoid radiation belts, comparing data during slewing with the ROSAT RASS, real time transmission of data rather than on-board storage. Any info on how long it typically observes each target ? Rod57 (talk) 14:58, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed automatic updating of orbital elements

I've proposed that this article be included in a trial involving using a bot to update orbital elements automatically on a fortnightly basis. I've started a discussion at WikiProject Spaceflight regarding this article and nine others, and would welcome some input from the users involved in maintaining the pages in question. --W. D. Graham 21:01, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

What surveys does it do or how is the observation programme run

What surveys does it do or how is the observation programme run ? Has it done any all-sky surveys ? How far ahead are observations planned ? - Rod57 (talk) 14:58, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Italic title

User:Huntster I'd like to ~~revert~~ clarify the use of italics [1] for the name. As XMM is an abbreviation (of the mission name), I would leave it without. I note Voyager 1 , Voyager 2 has italics (and the Voyager program doesn't), but none of these List of X-ray space telescopes use italics, so I'm looking for a reason to keep it, and if we keep it, the current title should use italics to match. Widefox; talk 22:42, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Widefox, do what you want. I have personal believes on italicization, mainly that any proper noun name of a spacecraft should be, including abbreviations. However, MOS:ITALICS has never been, and per editors there never will be, more specific on guidance for the subject. That absurdity is why I am no longer willing to expend much mental capital on arguing the topic. That said, I will point out that many of the names on the X-ray telescopes article should be italicized even per the limited available guidance, it's just that none of them ever have been since the article was first created. — Huntster (t @ c) 00:23, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Actually I agree with your sentiment about spacecraft names after rereading MOS:ITALIC and have modified above ...

It seems to hang on: 1. has the vessel been named or not? And 2. does a space telescope's (a payload of a unnamed vessel) name abide by telescope or spacecraft naming - the example of the Hubble Space Telescope article would indicate the former. Question 1. isn't answered clearly for me from reading the lede. The lede seems to either a) conflate the observatory name and the mission name, or b) they both have the same name which seems implausible given "...High Throughput X-ray Spectroscopy Mission and the X-ray Multi-Mirror Mission, is an X-ray space observatory..." doesn't look correct to me - if it's called "Mission" then isn't that the mission name and not the name of the observatory?! XMM-Newton looks like it's been given a name, so if it has, and if it's a vessel it should be italic, if a telescope then per Hubble, I guess not. At least we should deconflated the mission and telescope names, and have consistency with the italics in the name and title ie. either remove italics from the prose (or add {{italictitle}}, whichever is more correct). Widefox; talk 00:13, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

More details on the cooling please

It mentions cooling, and that radiators are involved, and that there is a two-stage system. Is liquid/gas coolant pumped around or is it all passive. Any phase change ? Presumably there are no cryogens that are being lost. How much colder could the sensors be cooled if desired ? - Rod57 (talk) 14:57, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

XMM-Newton spacecraft model.png

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 18:53, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]