Jump to content

Talk:Wow! signal

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleWow! signal has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
May 28, 2015Good article nomineeListed
On this day...Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on August 15, 2017, August 15, 2021, and August 15, 2023.

Modulation

[edit]

Can someone check this? As far as I'm aware, big ear didn't have the ability to determine if there was AM/FM modulation, this article outright states that the signal was unmodulated. I don't think we have any way of knowing that. 203.185.220.115 (talk) 22:08, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ref 9 says the signal was unmodulated, which is why the article says so as well. Primefac (talk) 09:42, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Bandwidth

[edit]

Can someone check this? The article correctly states that "The Wow! signal had a bandwidth of less than 10 kHz." Then it claims that the fractional bandwidth is about 1%. But 10kHz / 1420MHz is about 0.0007%.

Also, it's not the absolute bandwidth that matters for SETI; it's the relative bandwidth. So the comparison with the absolute bandwidth of masers is irrelevant. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 137.154.191.214 (talk) 03:57, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Citation 3

[edit]

Is a big statement of opinion and maybe not how a signal expert would frame it. Quote is from Vice, a pop mag, and the source of the opinion is someone listed as "science reporter" but without any indication of qualifications there or at other sources such as her professional bio. On that basis should be corrected IMO. Delete unless authoritative source is found for it. 71.191.175.136 (talk) 04:31, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I looked it over and tried to connect it to what more substantial sources had to say—and I agree. Removed for now until it or a similar claim can be readded with firmer grounding. Remsense 04:41, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Transmitted power of the response

[edit]

In the Response chapter, it is written "Arecibo scientists [...] beamed the transmission at roughly 20 times the power of the most powerful commercial radio transmitter".

However, the source states that it was the original signal that required 2.2 gigawatts, and at its peak was 30 times more powerful than ambient radiation from deep space. Also, the most powerful terrestrial radio transmitter has a power of about 2 GW, so I'm not sure what ‘20 times more’ refers to.

Arecibo message states that the response was transmitted with 450 kW, but I also couldn't find this in the sources there. Metropolismilk (talk) 21:38, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]