Talk:World Series of Poker Casino Employee Championship

World Series of Poker Casino Employee Championship has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
September 6, 2009	Good article nominee	Listed

A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on June 7, 2009.

The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that despite being a World Series of Poker bracelet event, the Casino Employee Championship receives little attention?

Gambling: Poker Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Gambling, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Gambling on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GamblingWikipedia:WikiProject GamblingTemplate:WikiProject GamblingGambling articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by WikiProject Poker (assessed as Low-importance).

WikiProject Gambling To-do:

Current collaborations:

Improve an article to FA

Improve an article to A

Help with the Gambling articles needing attention.
Tag the talk pages of Gambling-related articles with the {{WikiProject Gambling}} banner.
The link to the Missouri gambling site is now out of date and needs to be updated.
Japan section reads as though it was written by the gambling industry - quotes of 160% returns are 'citation needed'.

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:World Series of Poker Casino Employee Championship/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

GA review (see here for criteria)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
You seem to be the only one who has edited it, so stable enough for me. Seeing as you are just improving it.--WillC 05:31, 23 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
It is possible to add images to the article. Add the Andrew Cohen image found in his article.--WillC 08:16, 25 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

Entire review

Will be starting the review shortly.--WillC 05:31, 23 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This seems to be a list, why should it be a Good Article instead of a Featured List?--WillC 05:42, 23 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm doing this at 4 am, so the first few comments may make no sense considering I'm bored, tired, and do not feel like heading to bed just yet.--WillC 08:16, 25 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Lead

"The Casino Employees Championship is one of only three closed tournaments at the World Series of Poker." If the WSOP is a tournament, how can this be a tournament as well? Maybe it would be better to have it as "The Casino Employees Championship is one of only three closed tournaments at the World Series of Poker gathering."
"While most of the events are open to the general public, participants in the Ladies Championship, Seniors Championship, the Casino Employees Championship must meet certain eligibility requirements." → "While most of the events are open to the general public, participants in the Ladies Championship, Seniors Championship, and the Casino Employees Championship must meet certain eligibility requirements."
Lead seems a little small. Is this the standard for all or most articles of this kind?--WillC 08:16, 25 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]