This article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Globalization, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Globalization on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.GlobalizationWikipedia:WikiProject GlobalizationTemplate:WikiProject GlobalizationGlobalization
This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
--What a bunch of shit. This is without a doubt the worst pile of steaming propaganda I've ever seen on Wikipedia.---
This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because I'm in the process of trying to salvage content from an article with a 10-year history that has been deleted twice now because copyvio material was added. Guettarda (talk) 21:58, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I don't know if it should be deleted, but as currently constituted the article reads like a press release. If it's a placeholder while a more eXtensive article is being developed, there should be some way of noting that . . . DoctorFun1970 (talk) 10:59, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Clearly shocking style, including the use of "we". But WRI is a significant organization and has been for several decades. The article can readily be brought to the minimum standard for notability and given a good copy-edit. I haven't time but someone will. Best wishes. RobbieIanMorrison (talk) 16:40, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
It is possible something can be made out of this article about an American think-tank. most the content was a close copy of a number of press releases, and full of external links, I have removed the worst offending material. Dysklyver15:40, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Have made several improvements to language neutrality, objectivity, and style. More remains to be done, but at this point I would argue that this article is no longer excessively outside of standard Wikipedia quality. Jon rainheart (talk) 19:08, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
