Talk:Woodham Academy

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Woodham Academy article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Schools Low‑importance

	Schools portal This article is related to WikiProject Schools, a collaborative effort to write quality articles about schools around the world. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.SchoolsWikipedia:WikiProject SchoolsTemplate:WikiProject Schoolsschool articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

North East England Low‑importance

	North East England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject North East England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of North East England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.North East EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject North East EnglandTemplate:WikiProject North East EnglandNorth East England articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Assessment

I am upgrading this article to Start-class following a request at WP:WPSCH/A#R. This article is close to C-class but really needs further expansion. There is plenty of potential here as the school clearly has a history, in particular the fire should be discussed more given its clear importance. See WP:WPSCH/AG#S for ideas on new sections. The article is well illustrated though a few of the images on Wikimedia Commons have copyright issues and have been marked as such. CT Cooper · talk 12:02, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I think I will try to expand a little on the fire. Also, the school has a history with visits from Royalty and politicians and other notable people so I'm sure that could be incorporated somehow..--AycliffeAngel (talk) 15:07, 19 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

References are the problem, if you don't have any references - it's really making the article less reliable, currently all of the information on this article is referenced and it would be a shame to ruin that. If you have any un-sourced info, I think it would be best to place on this talk page for the time-being and try and get references for it later (if we can find them).
Thanks
--George2001hi (Discussion) 10:43, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Woodham academy logo.png Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Woodham academy logo.png, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Woodham academy logo.png)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 22:12, 29 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]