Talk:Woodcroft Halt railway station

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject Stations.
	This article is supported by WikiProject UK Railways (assessed as Low-importance).

Hampshire

	Hampshire portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hampshire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hampshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HampshireWikipedia:WikiProject HampshireTemplate:WikiProject HampshireHampshire
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Authors reponse

Please expand this article, I dont have a clue about this station as i created it as a connection to a quote in the rowlands casle station article. Thanks! Lenny 18:17, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This article was originally called Ditcham Woods halt, an interesting conflation in Hyperman 42's memory between Ditcham Park and Woodcroft. I am very satisfied with the new name: Google only gives four hits but they are all spot on. Whereas its only hits for "ditcham woods halt" are to this article. -- RHaworth 22:34, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have added a new diagram showing the disused halts on the portsmouth direct line. It shows woodcroft and denvilles within the current network. Lenny 08:00, 29 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Note: there are more references to Denvilles halt than Woodcroft. Denvilles DOES exist no matter what you may say. There is proof and thats all you need. Lenny 12:14, 29 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Don't tell us there are more references .... Give us the references. At the very least get out there and take a photo of the blue bricks. -- RHaworth 18:11, 29 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

There is an official reference on the Denvilles halt page, from a source that is reliable. As for this one (which is also my article) i cant find one reference on google or any other engines. There are no references on this article just links to storys about peoples lifes in ditcham. There is NO EVIDENCE and probably never will be. There is however a map showing a beeching-cut branch line neer petersfield but thats it. Have a nice time searching. Lenny 14:29, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oh! And also trespassing on the tracks is illegal so i cant possibly take any photos. Lenny 14:31, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Location of disused halts on the portsmouth direct line.png

Image:Location of disused halts on the portsmouth direct line.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 12:47, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]