Talk:Wonderputt

Wonderputt has been listed as one of the Video games good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: March 10, 2024. (Reviewed version).

Video games: Indie Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by the indie task force.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Cossacks (video games series) (2 participants)
Rat Race (video game) (7 participants)
Red Barrels (2 participants)
The Campaign Trail (Web Game) (23 participants)
Paper doll (video games) (5 participants)
TheoTown (10 participants; relisted)
Old Grandma Hardcore (6 participants; relisted)
WePlay AniMajor (2 participants; relisted)
Zero Hour (video game) (6 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

GA Review

Passed. λ NegativeMP1 20:22, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This review is transcluded from Talk:Wonderputt/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: NegativeMP1 (talk · contribs) 21:12, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Seeing this nomination and remembering this game existed unlocked some weird, distant memories I forgot I ever had. Anyways, soon. λ NegativeMP1 21:12, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! TWOrantula^TM (enter the web) 00:15, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for nominating @TrademarkedTWOrantula. Just a formality but as a significant contributor re. WP:GAN/I#N1 I am more than happy for this to be nominated. ＶＲＸＣＥＳ (talk) 05:13, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

How could I forget that D:
Honest mistake. I like underrated iOS games, and this article was basically begging me to be nominated. TWOrantula^TM (enter the web) 05:27, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No problem at all! ＶＲＸＣＥＳ (talk) 02:33, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quickfail checking

None of the quickfail criteria applies to this article. While the nominator is not the primary author, the primary author has given clear permission in the above discussion for the nominator to continue forth with the article. Onto the review. λ NegativeMP1 19:42, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Review

"Wonderputt is a 2011 golf video game created by Damp Gnat, the studio of independent developer Reece Millidge, for Flash and iOS." Consider changing to "Wonderputt is a 2011 golf video game created by Damp Gnat, the studio of independent developer Reece Millidge. Released on Flash and iOS ...", reads slightly better.

Changed.
"In Wonderputt, the player aims to complete eighteen holes of a mini golf course whilst avoiding traps and obstacles in as few swings as possible." → "In Wonderputt, the player aims to complete eighteen holes of a mini golf course in as few swings as possible, while avoiding traps and obstacles."
- Reworded.
"The game features a par score for individual holes and a points system for the final score, encouraging players to replay the game." this can probably be moved later down for better flow
- Moved.
Wikilinking mini golf a second time is fine, but I'm not sure if its recommended (I don't care, it's just something worth pointing out because MOS or something)
- I'm gonna unlink it. The article's pretty short.
Sales can be moved into Reception, either before or after Accolades
- Placed above Accolades.
I understand they're meant to summarize the following sentences, but "Reviewers were mixed on the gameplay and controls" and "Critics were mixed on the game's limited content and replayability" technically need their own citations.
- Hm... I'm just gonna put all the references from that section to the topic sentence (not sure if that works)
Spotchecked refs #1 and #12, both of which verify their contents.
- Not a review comment, but I have ran the WP:IABOT on this page out of courtesy.

Final comments

A very well written article, both you and Vrxces did incredible work here. Obscure mobile or indie games getting the attention they deserve on Wikipedia makes me happy. I'll place this on hold to give you time to address the comments, but they shouldn't take too long. λ NegativeMP1 19:42, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This has to be the simplest GA review I've seen xD TWOrantula^TM (enter the web) 19:44, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I mean, the article is pretty short and the subject is simple, plus I don't like to enforce my own personal writing style on others unless the writing doesn't make any sense. λ NegativeMP1 19:47, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@NegativeMP1: Finished. TWOrantula^TM (enter the web) 20:20, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.