Talk:Women in Syria

Skip to table of contents

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Women in Syria article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Syria High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Syria, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Syria on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SyriaWikipedia:WikiProject SyriaTemplate:WikiProject SyriaSyria
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women's History Mid‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Gender studies Mid‑importance

This article is part of WikiProject Gender studies. This WikiProject aims to improve the quality of articles dealing with gender studies and to remove systematic gender bias from Wikipedia. If you would like to participate in the project, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.Gender studiesWikipedia:WikiProject Gender studiesTemplate:WikiProject Gender studiesGender studies

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

To-do list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Assess : see Unassessed Gender studies articles and Unknown-importance Gender studies articles
Cleanup : edit to see
Collaborate : see /Collaboration
Copyedit : edit to see
Deletion sorting : see /Sexuality and gender
Expand : edit to see
Infobox : see Gender studies articles needing infoboxes
Merge : edit to see
Notability : edit to see
NPOV : edit to see
Orphans : Brannon Masculinity Scale · Holy Virility · Media and gender · Michael Kaufman (author) · Women's education in Saudi Arabia
Photo : see Wikipedia requested photographs of gender studies
Split : History of feminism
Stubs : see Gender studies stubs
Translate : see /translation
Update : edit to see
Verify : Riot grrrl
Needs attention : see Gender studies articles needing attention

Feminism

	Feminism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Feminism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Feminism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FeminismWikipedia:WikiProject FeminismTemplate:WikiProject FeminismFeminism
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

This article was the subject of an educational assignment in Spring 2015. Further details were available on the "Education Program:Ohio University/Women and Writing - 2 (Spring 2015)" page, which is now unavailable on the wiki.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Emilyhoak.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 04:58, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

نسرين طافش.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. Community Tech bot (talk) 19:21, 26 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

"History" section does not come from a neutral point of view

The "history" section of this article, particularly the last 5 paragraphs pertaining to the ongoing war in Syria, feel non-encyclopedic and biased. Using the term "freedom fighters" to refer to the Syrian opposition is very out of place. Claims about how Syrian rebels "targeted hospitals, schools and the country's infrastructure", regardless of whether or not they are true, are not sourced and aren't very relevant to the primary subject of the article, which is women and women's rights in Syria. Sections about abuses of women perpetrated by Syrian rebels could be valuable additions to the article, but they are not sourced and are thrown in with a bunch of content seemingly written from a pro Syrian government point of view.

A phrase like "despite the numerous claims of the MSM; throughout the entire country, many Syrian women are pro-government and pro-Bashar Al-Assad and vehement supporters of the Syrian Arab Army." serves to make the article look biased, especially when it is completely vague and unsourced. Who is "the MSM", what are their "numerous claims", and what is your reputable proof that they are incorrect? It has an almost conspiratorial tone that does not serve to improve the article.

The paragraph about the "all female brigade unit" could probably be a fine addition to the article, but like most of the other paragraphs in this section it seems as if it was written to portray the Syrian government and the Syrian Arab Army in a positive light rather than to provide a neutral and encyclopedic description of women in Syria.

The paragraph "They are applauded for their bravery and dedication to the homeland by the Syrian populace, echoing the bravery of the women in Syria throughout its long, ancient history" should not be in any neutral article, it is a completely subjective and unsourced statement.

I understand that anything surrounding Syria can be highly controversial, and I know that many people have strong opinions about the conflict going on there, but Wikipedia should seek to provide a neutral view wherever possible, especially since many people will read articles like these as one of their only sources of information on something they don't know much about. I am new to Wikipedia discussion and I do not really know too much about the subject, these are just some things I noticed reading through. Any additions or feedback would be greatly appreciated. Thank you for reading. Biggestcrab (talk) 00:48, 14 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]