This article is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject AfricaTemplate:WikiProject AfricaAfrica
This article is part of WikiProject Gender studies. This WikiProject aims to improve the quality of articles dealing with gender studies and to remove systematic gender bias from Wikipedia. If you would like to participate in the project, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.Gender studiesWikipedia:WikiProject Gender studiesTemplate:WikiProject Gender studiesGender studies
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Feminism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Feminism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FeminismWikipedia:WikiProject FeminismTemplate:WikiProject FeminismFeminism
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wiki Loves Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women in Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Wiki Loves WomenWikipedia:WikiProject Wiki Loves WomenTemplate:WikiProject Wiki Loves WomenWiki Loves Women
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anthropology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Anthropology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AnthropologyWikipedia:WikiProject AnthropologyTemplate:WikiProject AnthropologyAnthropology
"Unwed mothers are the societal norm, and the law requires fathers to support their children". I see that this is copied directly from the source, but I don't really understand what it means. does it mean that the societal norm is that
1. mothers (and fathers) live together as a family but without marrying,
or
2. mothers rarely live together with the father of their child
or
3. the meaning is obvious, but my limited grasp of english makes it incomprehensible to me.
I just quickly read the article, and found it confusing. It begins with a tone suggesting that Seychelles is a panacea for women. Follows is indeed a vague unexplained men/women relationship (as the previous comment mentions, that women generally don't marry but have children, but also that men must legally oblige to support their children; without mention about if those women and men have generally single or multiple partners, if broken families are a societal issue, etc; but it gives a little glimpse about the network of female relatives to care for the children, but some context is missing). It then mentions violence and rape, but in the past tense (possibly meaning that those statistics no longer apply? This isn't clear). It then proceeds to mention what appears to be long prison sentences for men who abuse women (perhaps instated after the previouly mentioned violence issues?), and concludes about loosely enforced laws and rampant prostitution statistics.
It's possible that the confusion stems from a few biased opinions here and there, or that the article is simply too short, assuming a lot of inside knowledge. Some work would be needed to achieve consistency and provide the reader with a reasonable idea of the lifestyle of the Seychelles people. Ultimately, since the article is short, perhaps that the few clear and interesting points could be merged into a larger main article, especially if the situation of women in Seychelles is not particularily notable to deserve its own article (something which I cannot personally evaluate reading the current article); this would be less work than rewriting everything. 76.10.128.192 (talk) 05:03, 5 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]