Talk:Women's strike

	This disambiguation page was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This disambiguation page was accepted from this draft on 3 January 2019 by reviewer KylieTastic (talk · contribs).

Disambiguation

This disambiguation page is within the scope of WikiProject Disambiguation, an attempt to structure and organize all disambiguation pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, you can edit the page attached to this talk page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.DisambiguationWikipedia:WikiProject DisambiguationTemplate:WikiProject DisambiguationDisambiguation articles

Women's History

This disambiguation page is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles

Disambiguation or list?

This page is structured like a disambiguation page, but reads more like a list. Thoughts on creating List of women's strikes? ---Another Believer _(Talk) 00:32, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@KylieTastic and Colonel Contatanozzi: Ping! ---Another Believer _(Talk) 00:32, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Onel5969: I see you've been working on related articles as well. ---Another Believer _(Talk) 00:33, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I think it's definitely more of a list, than a true dab page. If it does get changed to a list, the 10 or so hatnotes and See also's will have to be corrected, but that's no biggie. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 00:35, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

In many cases disambiguations and lists are very different things, but I guess in this case they are both valid options for the content. I don't have a preference for either, but I also generally don't like change for no definitive reason. If there are more articles that would be added if a list then fine. See what Colonel Contatanozzi thinks. Cheers KylieTastic (talk) 13:28, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion removed

Reason for speedy deletion: "This article may meet Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion as a page created by a banned or blocked user (Soapamalkanmaime – SPI confirmed suspected) in violation of the user's ban or block, with no substantial edits by others. See CSD G5." It's a disambiguation page! Three other editors besides the creator have already commented on the Talk page and made edits on the article. There is no reason to think that other editors won't contribute to it. RebeccaGreen (talk) 01:26, 17 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]