Talk:William M. Haussmann Sr.

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted from this draft on 4 January 2016 by reviewer MatthewVanitas (talk · contribs).

Biography: Arts and Entertainment

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group.

Architecture

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

COI tag (October 2023)

The creating editor has been welcomed as a COI editor. Although this was an accepted COI draft it is important that COI processes are followed. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 22:43, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Referencing and notability

At present, as presented, I am seeing slim claims to notability. The references are difficult to check. More than one is not helpful in verifying notability. Passing mentions and primary sources just will not do the job. Recognising that this is an accepted AFC draft, I'm asking MatthewVanitas for their thoughts. I agree that it stood a better than 50% chance of surviving an immediate deletion discussion, thus agree acceptance was likely valid, yet I have doubts at this time remove from their acceptance that this is well enough referenced to remain. However, referencing is not all. Inherent notability trumps paucity of referencing, and I think Haussman is likely inherently notable. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 09:43, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]