Talk:William Keiser

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Articles for creation

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted from this draft on 3 February 2024 by reviewer TipsyElephant (talk · contribs).

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Screenwriters Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Screenwriters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of screenwriting, screenwriters, and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScreenwritersWikipedia:WikiProject ScreenwritersTemplate:WikiProject Screenwritersscreenwriter articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Podcasting Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Podcasting, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of notable podcasts and podcast-related information on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PodcastingWikipedia:WikiProject PodcastingTemplate:WikiProject Podcastingpodcasting articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Sociology Low‑importance

	Society portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

LGBTQ+ studies

This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBTQ-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBTQ+ studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesLGBTQ+ studies articles

Dance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Dance, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Dance and Dance-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DanceWikipedia:WikiProject DanceTemplate:WikiProject DanceDance articles

WikiProject Dance To-do list:

To nominate at WP:FAC:
To improve to Featured standard:
To nominate as a Good article:
To expand: 18th century dance - 20th century ballet - Bolero - Choreography on Broadway - Dance education - English ballet - Indian classical dance - Italian ballet - List of dance companies - Meg Stuart - Opera ballet - Sasha Waltz - Scotch reel - Set dance - Physically integrated dance
To cleanup: Contra dance - Salsa (dance) - Dandiya - Lead and follow
To unbias:
To check for copyvios:
To merge: List of dancers and List of dance personalities‎ as per AfD discussion
Substubs needing expansion: see /substubs
To destub: Amir Hossain Babu - Canada Dance Festival - Dance etiquette - Flash dance - more
Needing references: Chorus line - specifically verifying that each girl actually started out as a chorine
To create: Broadway dance - Country Western Dance International - Dance and cinema - Dance and society - German folk dancing - Latin swing - Post-structuralist ballet - Push (dance) - Salon dance - Shuffle dance - Swing boogie - World Dance Alliance - Xavier Le Roy - more
Wanted Pics/Graphics: Category:Dance articles needing images

Addressing possible COI

Hello Guglielmoebreo, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I wanted to ask whether you have any conflict of interest with the subject of this article because your edit history suggests that you are a WP:SPA. Basically, do you know this person in real life or do you work with or for this person. You don't have to dox yourself, but a simple "yes I have a personal or professional connection to the subject" or "no I do not" will suffice. TipsyElephant (talk) 00:31, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC source analysis

These are the best references that I see currently cited in the draft and my assessment of whether they contribute to notability.

Source analysis
Source	Independent?	Significant?	Reliable?	Counts to GNG?
Washington City Paper	Yes	Maybe, it looks like there is some quoting here and there and it seems to be focused on the podcast a bit, but overall it's got some decent coverage.	Maybe, it looks like it's a local alt-weekly publication that recently changed management. Their submission guide for freelance writers makes me think their editorial policy are pretty decent. It also looks like the author joined the staff as an editor shortly before writing the piece.	Maybe, it's not a full profile piece in the NYT, but it's not bad.
Washington Blade	Yes	Not bad, it's focused on his work on the podcast.	Maybe, this appears to be a local newspaper and I don't see any editorial policies or list of staff. There is a byline, but there isn't any information about the author other than their name. Googling the name along with the name of the publication brings up the person's instagram, which says he is a contributor not a staff member.	Maybe, but likely not reliable.
Washingtonian	Yes	Yes, seems like a decent piece	Yes, I don't see much in the way of editorial policies, but it's a more well known source and the author is an editorial fellow.	Yes
The Eagle	Yes	Yes	Maybe, student news is generally less reliable, but as far as student newspapers go this is a pretty good one. It's well established and appears to be transparent about how the paper is run and they have some pretty decent editorial policies.	Maybe, student news isn't the best but as far as student news goes this is pretty good.
Voyage LA	Interviews don't count as independent sources	Yes	Maybe, I don't see a byline or a list of staff. The editorial policies are pretty lacking as well.	No, it's not a terrible source, but it doesn't help with notability.

If any more decent sources are found it would help me make the decision as to whether this should be accepted to mainspace. TipsyElephant (talk) 01:43, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I brought this to RSN for discussion: Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_426#Reliability_of_Washington_City_Paper,_Washington_Blade,_and_Washingtonian. The responses seemed fairly mixed with a focus on whether these are local sources and whether local sources contribute to notability. TipsyElephant (talk) 17:04, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]