Talk:William Dowdeswell (politician, born 1682)

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Requested move 24 May 2019

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: not moved - consensus against the proposal. (closed by non-admin page mover) Thanks, -- DannyS712 (talk) 18:56, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

William Dowdeswell (politician, born 1682) → William Dowdeswell (1682–1728) – Universal form of bio article name used in Wikipedia. --ExperiencedArticleFixer (talk) 11:31, 24 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This is a contested technical request (permalink). Anthony Appleyard (talk) 20:33, 24 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@ExperiencedArticleFixer and Steel1943: queried move request Anthony Appleyard (talk) 20:35, 24 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This request goes against the year born/year death disambiguation methodology outlined in WP:NCPDAB; per the aforementioned guideline, the current name is the preferred name since William Dowdeswell (politician) is ambiguous. Steel1943 (talk) 18:37, 24 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Steel1943. The current title appears to be the correct form. PC78 (talk) 21:12, 24 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Steel1943 and PC78. Parenthetical qualifiers consisting solely of vital dates should be used only as a last resort when no consensus can be achieved for a descriptive qualifier. Also, a simple glance at the William Dowdeswell disambiguation page would confirm that the proposed form would no longer be analogous to the other entries listed there. —Roman Spinner (talk • contribs) 20:00, 25 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Rubbish. We prefer occupation and birth year only. -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:27, 29 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.