This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mathematics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mathematics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MathematicsWikipedia:WikiProject MathematicsTemplate:WikiProject Mathematicsmathematics
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy
I removed "When this 780-page book appeared in 1993, it quickly replaced "Model Theory" by Chang and Keisler as the standard textbook on model theory." and replaced it with "When this 780-page book appeared in 1993, it quickly became one of the standard textbooks model theory."
It might be difficult to cite either version. I think the second, weaker version is not controversial, but the origional seems to suggest that in 1994 Chang and Keisler was no longer considered a standard textbook. Bearing in mind that the choice of material and style is rather different, I think that many see these books as complementary texts - to say nothing of newer books like Marker or Poizat, or whatever your favorite is. Thehalfone (talk) 13:40, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
