Talk:Westford Knight

United States: Massachusetts Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Massachusetts portal This article is supported by WikiProject Massachusetts.

[Untitled]

Is it possible to get better pictures? I can't see a "sword" or a "shield" in either of these two images. The "detail" photo just looks like a rock. Am I missing something?

The hilt of the "sword" points NE and the blade points SW on the image. The length of the image follows the fissures in the rock. It is a bit easier to see if you turn tilt your head 45 degrees to the right. I can't see a shiled though. The first thing that jumps to my mind is that the hilt of the sword looks way too big and the blade too short. In my book: a cute story but a hoax. Valentinian ^(talk) 12:49, 9 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The Westford carving is most definetely a hoax, though that does dot of itself disprove the possibility that Sir Henry Sinclair made an expedition to America. There is, however, no doubt at all that the Sinclair/Templar fleet story is derived from the writings of Fr. Hay, an 18th Century Paris-based romanticist. CSinc.

The reason you can't see the "sword" or "shield" is because they are non-existent. There is no image on the stone, except when someone draws it in chalk. Without the chalk image, there is simply nothing there. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.56.193.204 (talk) 17:24, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Henry Sinclair never travelled to America

Henry Sinclair travelled to America in 1398? Where's the evidence? What about the Orkney Manorial Records, don't they place him in Scotland during this period of time? And Henry Sinclair's descendants in America, what do they know about this fantastic piece of earth-shattering history?

Brian Smith, Earl Henry Sinclair's fictitious trip to America http://www.users.zetnet.co.uk/ahamilton/sinclair.htm First published in New Orkney Antiquarian Journal, vol. 2, 2002 Wfgh66 (talk) 13:42, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Why is the new statue WP:UNDUE

@doug weller, why would the addition of the contemporary statue be WP:UNDUE? It is backed up by a source and is relevant to the article. It is a contemporary statue made by the people who maintain the carving as what they believe the carving depicts. Scu ba (talk) 12:51, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Scu ba I've brought this up at the WP:Fringe theories/Noticeboard#Westford Knight - was this edit Undue?. I suggested editors might want to respond here. I hadn't realised until I read the source that Scott Wolter was involved and that the sculptor was working with him. This Hooked X stuff is nonsense. Doug Weller talk 15:43, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not mentioning the hooked X or walker, just that there is a statue at the site and the organization that put it there. Scu ba (talk) 17:26, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]