Talk:Wesley Warren Jr.

This article was nominated for deletion on 26 July 2021. The result of the discussion was speedy keep.

A fact from Wesley Warren Jr. appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 24 June 2013 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that a man with a scrotum estimated to weigh over 160 pounds (73 kg) is the subject of a Channel 4 documentary titled The Man with the 10-Stone Testicles?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2013/June. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Wesley Warren Jr..

Wikipedia

Biography

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	An appropriate infobox may need to be added to this article. Please refer to the list of biography infoboxes for further information.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Nevada (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Nevada, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.NevadaWikipedia:WikiProject NevadaTemplate:WikiProject NevadaNevada

Medicine Low‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Age?

The article quotes him as saying "I should be in the prime of my life right now." This should be in some sort of context, like, how old is he? --Keeves (talk) 16:35, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

He's 48, which I think would make his birth year 1965? Prioryman (talk) 17:40, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Name

It appears to be missing a comma (compare to Martin Luther King, Jr..- Gilliam (talk) 23:14, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Source issues

Is Las Vegas Review-Journal a reliable/respectable enough source for a BLP, particularly when it comes personal sensitive bits? -- Hillbillyholiday ^talk 23:45, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It's the main newspaper there and the largest newspaper in Nevada, as you'd know if (a) you'd ever read it or (b) you'd read Wikipedia's article about it. And no, it's not a tabloid. Prioryman (talk) 06:20, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, my bad. I read the article straight after posting, seems fine.

As for removing the reviews, I did consider leaving them, but they are not integral to the story of Warren, Jr. himself, I cut them out. Although the Mirror and Metro are raising concerns about the documentary, I typically avoid these sort of sources in BLPs whether they support contentious information or not. I can see why they may be justifiable in this case, but given the general quality of these publications, I would rather they were not in any bio. Seriously, is this really a good enough article to be using in a BLP? -- Hillbillyholiday ^talk 06:49, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The article is as much about the documentary as about the man himself - both have received widespread coverage. The reviews are valuable in highlighting the key points of the documentary, especially the way that it indicts the appalling nature of the so-called health care system in the US. It's hardly uncomplimentary about Warren - as the Metro article you highlighted says, "Wesley Warren, Jr showed remarkable courage and determination to get the surgery he needed" and the documentary was an "inspiring story of human fortitude in the face of outlandish bad luck." Prioryman (talk) 07:00, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough. After seeing the Sun used a source about the man's penis, I wasn't too happy about finding more tabloids in the article. The deletion of text was nothing personal, I'm just fairly ruthless when it comes to BLPs. -- Hillbillyholiday ^talk 07:12, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The penis factoid was quite widely reported - I think it was in the Huffington Post too - and if I remember rightly it was in the documentary. The bit about him selling his testicles on eBay was certainly in the documentary; there's a scene where his doctor persuades him that it would be a bad idea. Prioryman (talk) 07:17, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I wasn't doubting the veracity of that particular claim to fame, just the sourcing. I couldn't stomach the documentary, but seeing as you watched it, I'll have to bow to your greater experience when it comes to talking bollocks! -- Hillbillyholiday ^talk 08:14, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talking bollocks... oh, if only American English had such a double entendre... — Crisco 1492 (talk) 16:00, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]