Talk:Werkspoor
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Werkspoor article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Moving the predecessors of Werkspoor to their own page
[edit]To me it seems logical to move the direct predecessors of Werkspoor (c 1891) to their own page or pages. The main focus of Werkspoor was rolling stock. That of the predecessors Van Vlissingen en Dudok van Heel and the Koninklijke Fabriek van Stoom- en andere Werktuigen was the production of engines and ships. It was definitely not the construction of rolling stock. After a split the resulting pages would be much more cohesive and readable. I am still considering where to create this split. Grieg2 (talk) 21:26, 22 October 2019 (UTC)
Just moved the predecessors of Werkspoor to Van Vlissingen en Dudok van Heel and slightly re-organized this page.Grieg2 (talk) 10:27, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
Categories:
- C-Class aviation articles
- C-Class aircraft articles
- WikiProject Aircraft articles
- WikiProject Aviation articles
- C-Class Netherlands articles
- All WikiProject Netherlands pages
- C-Class Engineering articles
- Unknown-importance Engineering articles
- WikiProject Engineering articles
- C-Class company articles
- Unknown-importance company articles
- WikiProject Companies articles
- C-Class rail transport articles
- Mid-importance rail transport articles
- Locomotives task force articles
- Passenger trains task force articles
- All WikiProject Trains pages